SCHJ vs. OVT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCHJ (Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) and OVT (Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. SCHJ is passively managed, while OVT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHJ returned 2.31%/yr vs 3.01%/yr for OVT. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHJ charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for OVT.

Performance

SCHJ vs. OVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHJ achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than OVT's 2.61% return.

SCHJ

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.86%
• 1Y: 4.52%
• 3Y*: 5.49%
• 5Y*: 2.31%
• 10Y*: —

OVT

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 2.61%
• 6M: 3.07%
• 1Y: 8.92%
• 3Y*: 7.44%
• 5Y*: 3.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHJ vs. OVT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF	0.56%	6.80%	4.89%	6.36%	-5.73%	-0.58%
OVT Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF	2.61%	7.61%	7.44%	7.73%	-9.68%	2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHJ and OVT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2021	0.64

The correlation between SCHJ and OVT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHJ vs. OVT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHJ	OVT
Financial Services	30.8%	11.8%
Technology	8.3%	35.6%
Healthcare	7.9%	8.5%
Industrials	7.2%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	10.1%
Utilities	6.4%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.9%
Communication Services	4.3%	11.2%
Real Estate	4.1%	1.9%
Energy	4.0%	3.5%
Basic Materials	1.4%	1.8%

Return for Risk

SCHJ vs. OVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHJ

SCHJ Risk / Return Rank: 72
SCHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SCHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
SCHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 79
SCHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
SCHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

OVT

OVT Risk / Return Rank: 85
OVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
OVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
OVT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
OVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
OVT Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHJ vs. OVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHJ	OVT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.60	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	3.83	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.51	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	5.78	-2.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.17	20.00	-7.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHJ vs. OVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the OVT Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHJ and OVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHJ	OVT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	2.60	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.65	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.69	-0.05

Drawdowns

SCHJ vs. OVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, roughly equal to the maximum OVT drawdown of -13.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and OVT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHJ	OVT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.62%	-13.59%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.47%	-1.55%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.47%	-3.55%	+2.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.43%	-13.59%	+4.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-0.41%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.88%	-3.39%	+1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	0.45%	-0.08%

Volatility

SCHJ vs. OVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) is 0.55%, while Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) has a volatility of 0.83%. This indicates that SCHJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHJ	OVT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.55%	0.83%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.35%	2.52%	-1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87%	3.44%	-1.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.94%	4.63%	-1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.13%	4.54%	-0.41%

SCHJ vs. OVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHJ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than OVT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHJ vs. OVT - Dividend Comparison

SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than OVT's 8.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
OVT Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF	8.17%	7.21%	6.15%	5.11%	4.12%	4.41%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF	4.50%	4.42%	4.00%	2.98%	1.64%	0.94%	2.54%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHJ and OVT in my portfolio?

SCHJ and OVT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHJ or OVT?

OVT has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to SCHJ (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHJ dropped -13.62% vs OVT's -13.59%.

Which ETF is better, SCHJ or OVT?

On 5-year performance, OVT leads with 3.01% vs 2.31% for SCHJ. On fees, SCHJ is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SCHJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHJ or OVT?

Over the 5-year period, OVT has performed better with a 3.01% return vs 2.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHJ or OVT?

SCHJ is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHJ or OVT?

OVT has the higher dividend yield at 8.17%, compared with 4.50% for SCHJ.

What is the main difference between SCHJ and OVT?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHJ and 0.80% for OVT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.