PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHJ vs. HYGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHJ vs. HYGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHJ achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than HYGH's 3.37% return.


SCHJ

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.76%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
5.55%
5Y*
2.34%
10Y*

HYGH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.60%
YTD
3.37%
6M
3.70%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
9.89%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
6.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHJ vs. HYGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
0.56%6.80%4.89%6.36%-5.73%-0.67%5.30%0.61%
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
3.37%6.94%11.22%12.17%-0.92%5.82%0.54%4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHJ and HYGH is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHJ vs. HYGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHJ
SCHJ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SCHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGH
HYGH Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HYGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGH Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGH Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHJ vs. HYGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHJHYGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

4.82

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.02

18.86

-7.84

SCHJ vs. HYGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the HYGH Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHJ and HYGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHJ vs. HYGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum HYGH drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and HYGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHJHYGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-23.88%

+10.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-1.62%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.47%

-8.06%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.43%

-8.24%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.05%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-2.22%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

0.41%

-0.03%

Volatility

SCHJ vs. HYGH - Volatility Comparison

Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) has a higher volatility of 0.68% compared to iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) at 0.63%. This indicates that SCHJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHJHYGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

0.63%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.46%

2.81%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92%

3.65%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.95%

7.08%

-4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.12%

8.33%

-4.21%

SCHJ vs. HYGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHJ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGH's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHJ vs. HYGH - Dividend Comparison

SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than HYGH's 6.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
6.60%6.86%7.85%8.95%6.21%3.74%4.06%4.89%6.45%4.79%4.60%5.75%
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.50%4.42%4.00%2.98%1.64%0.94%2.54%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHJ and HYGH have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHJ has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to HYGH (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHJ dropped -13.62% vs HYGH's -23.88%.

On 5-year performance, HYGH leads with 6.94% vs 2.34% for SCHJ. On fees, SCHJ is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYGH has performed better with a 6.94% return vs 2.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHJ is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for HYGH.

HYGH has the higher dividend yield at 6.60%, compared with 4.50% for SCHJ.

SCHJ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while HYGH is High Yield Bonds. SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while HYGH tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Interest Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHJ and 0.52% for HYGH.

SCHJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHJ and HYGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer