SCHJ vs. BBCB
SCHJ (Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) and BBCB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - SCHJ tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y) while BBCB tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHJ returned 2.31%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for BBCB. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHJ charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for BBCB.
Performance
SCHJ vs. BBCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHJ achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than BBCB's 2.82% return.
SCHJ
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- —
BBCB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 8.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHJ vs. BBCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.56% | 6.80% | 4.89% | 6.36% | -5.73% | -0.67% | 5.30% | 0.61% |
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 2.82% | 7.69% | 1.97% | 8.42% | -15.72% | -2.23% | 10.39% | 1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHJ and BBCB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SCHJ and BBCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHJ vs. BBCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHJ
BBCB
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
SCHJ
BBCB
Technology
SCHJ
BBCB
Healthcare
SCHJ
BBCB
Industrials
SCHJ
BBCB
Consumer Cyclical
SCHJ
BBCB
Utilities
SCHJ
BBCB
Consumer Defensive
SCHJ
BBCB
Communication Services
SCHJ
BBCB
Real Estate
SCHJ
BBCB
Energy
SCHJ
BBCB
Basic Materials
SCHJ
BBCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHJ vs. BBCB — Risk / Return Rank
SCHJ
BBCB
SCHJ vs. BBCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHJ | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.34 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 2.85 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.17 | 10.09 | +2.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHJ | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 1.71 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.12 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.46 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
SCHJ vs. BBCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum BBCB drawdown of -22.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and BBCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHJ | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -22.48% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.47% | -2.95% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.47% | -6.46% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.43% | -22.32% | +12.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.34% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -6.66% | +4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | 0.83% | -0.46% |
Volatility
SCHJ vs. BBCB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) is 0.55%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that SCHJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHJ | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.55% | 1.41% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.35% | 3.98% | -2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87% | 4.93% | -3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 7.25% | -4.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.13% | 7.50% | -3.37% |
SCHJ vs. BBCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHJ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BBCB's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHJ vs. BBCB - Dividend Comparison
SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than BBCB's 7.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 7.15% | 5.02% | 5.22% | 4.22% | 3.39% | 3.47% | 4.59% | 5.25% | 0.20% |
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.50% | 4.42% | 4.00% | 2.98% | 1.64% | 0.94% | 2.54% | 0.42% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHJ and BBCB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBCB has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to SCHJ (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHJ dropped -13.62% vs BBCB's -22.48%.
On 5-year performance, SCHJ leads with 2.31% vs 0.84% for BBCB. On fees, SCHJ is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SCHJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHJ has performed better with a 2.31% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHJ is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for BBCB.
BBCB has the higher dividend yield at 7.15%, compared with 4.50% for SCHJ.
SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while BBCB tracks Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHJ and 0.09% for BBCB.
SCHJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHJ and BBCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer