SCHH vs. XLRI
SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHH is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. SCHH is passively managed, while XLRI is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHH charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.
Performance
SCHH vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly higher than XLRI's 5.32% return.
SCHH
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 13.92%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- 1Y
- 14.58%
- 3Y*
- 11.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 4.16%
XLRI
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 6.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHH vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 13.92% | -1.45% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 5.32% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHH and XLRI is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHH vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank
SCHH
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHH vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHH | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.53 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHH vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and XLRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHH | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.22% | -7.12% | -37.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | -1.83% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -1.65% | -7.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | — | — |
Volatility
SCHH vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHH | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.38% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.86% | 10.93% | +2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 10.93% | +7.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 10.93% | +10.09% |
SCHH vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHH vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison
SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than XLRI's 12.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.75% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 12.40% | 6.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SCHH and XLRI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLRI.
XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 12.40%, compared with 2.75% for SCHH.
SCHH is categorized as REIT, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.35% for XLRI.
Find the right allocation for SCHH and XLRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer