SCHH vs. PSR
SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) and PSR (Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund) are both REIT funds. SCHH is passively managed, while PSR is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHH returned 4.28%/yr vs 5.79%/yr for PSR. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHH charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PSR.
Performance
SCHH vs. PSR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly lower than PSR's 13.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has underperformed PSR with an annualized return of 4.28%, while PSR has yielded a comparatively higher 5.79% annualized return.
SCHH
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 12.23%
- 1Y
- 13.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 4.28%
PSR
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 13.71%
- 6M
- 13.34%
- 1Y
- 13.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.74%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 5.79%
SCHH vs. PSR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 12.96% | 2.20% | 4.99% | 11.18% | -24.99% | 41.07% | -14.81% | 22.85% | -4.26% | 3.68% |
PSR Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund | 13.71% | 2.63% | 1.79% | 8.34% | -25.52% | 41.71% | -6.04% | 28.76% | -4.58% | 11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHH and PSR is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2011 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SCHH and PSR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHH vs. PSR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHH
PSR
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
SCHH
PSR
Basic Materials
SCHH
PSR
Financial Services
SCHH
PSR
Communication Services
SCHH
-
PSR
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHH
-
PSR
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHH
-
PSR
-
Energy
SCHH
-
PSR
-
Healthcare
SCHH
-
PSR
-
Industrials
SCHH
-
PSR
-
Technology
SCHH
-
PSR
-
Utilities
SCHH
-
PSR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHH vs. PSR — Risk / Return Rank
SCHH
PSR
SCHH vs. PSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund (PSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHH | PSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 1.68 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.34 | 5.27 | +0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHH | PSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.14 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.29 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.51 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
SCHH vs. PSR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, roughly equal to the maximum PSR drawdown of -42.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and PSR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHH | PSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.22% | -42.31% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -8.33% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -16.58% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.28% | -34.81% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.22% | -42.31% | -1.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -4.15% | +2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -9.33% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 2.65% | -0.02% |
Volatility
SCHH vs. PSR - Volatility Comparison
Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund (PSR) have volatilities of 4.17% and 4.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHH | PSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 4.29% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | 9.68% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 13.21% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 18.54% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 20.31% | +0.66% |
SCHH vs. PSR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PSR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHH vs. PSR - Dividend Comparison
SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than PSR's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSR Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund | 2.38% | 2.56% | 3.06% | 2.93% | 2.95% | 2.12% | 3.09% | 2.55% | 2.64% | 0.14% | 3.60% | 3.20% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.77% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SCHH and PSR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PSR has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to SCHH (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs PSR's -42.31%.
On 10-year performance, PSR leads with 5.79% vs 4.28% for SCHH. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCHH has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSR has performed better with a 5.79% return vs 4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PSR.
SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 2.38% for PSR.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.35% for PSR.
PSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHH and PSR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer