PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHH vs. IWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHH vs. IWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCHH having a 16.33% return and IWS slightly higher at 16.45%. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has underperformed IWS with an annualized return of 4.51%, while IWS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.


SCHH

1D
1.00%
1M
3.20%
YTD
16.33%
6M
16.33%
1Y
15.97%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
4.51%

IWS

1D
1.16%
1M
4.03%
YTD
16.45%
6M
15.28%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHH vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
16.33%2.20%4.99%11.18%-24.99%41.07%-14.81%22.85%-4.26%3.68%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
16.45%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHH and IWS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.69

The correlation between SCHH and IWS shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHH vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHH
IWS

Real Estate

98.5%
8.2%

Basic Materials

1.3%
5.4%

Financial Services

0.2%
13.7%

Communication Services

-

3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Energy

-

7.7%

Healthcare

-

7.5%

Industrials

-

16.5%

Technology

-

18.2%

Utilities

-

6.5%

Real Estate

SCHH
98.5%
IWS
8.2%

Basic Materials

SCHH
1.3%
IWS
5.4%

Financial Services

SCHH
0.2%
IWS
13.7%

Communication Services

SCHH

-

IWS
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHH

-

IWS
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

SCHH

-

IWS
4.8%

Energy

SCHH

-

IWS
7.7%

Healthcare

SCHH

-

IWS
7.5%

Industrials

SCHH

-

IWS
16.5%

Technology

SCHH

-

IWS
18.2%

Utilities

SCHH

-

IWS
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHH vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHH vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHHIWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.36

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

3.68

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.10

13.82

-7.72

SCHH vs. IWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHH Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the IWS Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHH and IWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHH vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and IWS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHHIWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.22%

-62.40%

+18.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-7.53%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-20.57%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.28%

-21.23%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

-43.83%

-0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-8.01%

-1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.00%

+0.63%

Volatility

SCHH vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison

Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) at 4.29%. This indicates that SCHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHHIWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

4.29%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

9.97%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

13.53%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.74%

17.36%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.99%

19.37%

+1.62%

SCHH vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHH vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison

SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than IWS's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.32%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.69%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHH and IWS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHH has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to IWS (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs IWS's -62.40%.

On 10-year performance, IWS leads with 10.51% vs 4.51% for SCHH. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWS has performed better with a 10.51% return vs 4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.

SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.32% for IWS.

SCHH is categorized as REIT, while IWS is Mid Cap Value Equities. SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.23% for IWS.

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHH and IWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer