SCHH vs. IWS
SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) and IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHH is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while IWS is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHH returned 4.51%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for IWS. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHH charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWS.
Performance
SCHH vs. IWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCHH having a 16.33% return and IWS slightly higher at 16.45%. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has underperformed IWS with an annualized return of 4.51%, while IWS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.
SCHH
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 16.33%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 15.97%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 4.51%
IWS
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
SCHH vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 16.33% | 2.20% | 4.99% | 11.18% | -24.99% | 41.07% | -14.81% | 22.85% | -4.26% | 3.68% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 16.45% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 13.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHH and IWS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.69 |
The correlation between SCHH and IWS shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHH vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHH
IWS
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
SCHH
IWS
Basic Materials
SCHH
IWS
Financial Services
SCHH
IWS
Communication Services
SCHH
-
IWS
Consumer Cyclical
SCHH
-
IWS
Consumer Defensive
SCHH
-
IWS
Energy
SCHH
-
IWS
Healthcare
SCHH
-
IWS
Industrials
SCHH
-
IWS
Technology
SCHH
-
IWS
Utilities
SCHH
-
IWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHH vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank
SCHH
IWS
SCHH vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHH | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 3.68 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.10 | 13.82 | -7.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHH vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and IWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHH | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.22% | -62.40% | +18.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -7.53% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -20.57% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.28% | -21.23% | -12.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.22% | -43.83% | -0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -8.01% | -1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 2.00% | +0.63% |
Volatility
SCHH vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison
Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) at 4.29%. This indicates that SCHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHH | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 4.29% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 9.97% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 13.53% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.74% | 17.36% | +1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 19.37% | +1.62% |
SCHH vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHH vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison
SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than IWS's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.32% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.69% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHH and IWS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHH has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to IWS (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs IWS's -62.40%.
On 10-year performance, IWS leads with 10.51% vs 4.51% for SCHH. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWS has performed better with a 10.51% return vs 4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.
SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.32% for IWS.
SCHH is categorized as REIT, while IWS is Mid Cap Value Equities. SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.23% for IWS.
IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHH and IWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer