SCHF vs. USRT
SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and USRT (iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while USRT is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHF returned 10.82%/yr vs 6.67%/yr for USRT. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for USRT.
Performance
SCHF vs. USRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly lower than USRT's 17.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has outperformed USRT with an annualized return of 10.82%, while USRT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.67% annualized return.
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 30.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
USRT
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 17.79%
- 6M
- 17.95%
- 1Y
- 19.33%
- 3Y*
- 12.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.06%
- 10Y*
- 6.67%
SCHF vs. USRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 15.39% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 17.79% | 2.44% | 8.58% | 13.64% | -24.43% | 43.26% | -8.06% | 25.98% | -4.67% | 5.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHF and USRT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.54 |
The correlation between SCHF and USRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHF vs. USRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHF
USRT
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
SCHF
USRT
Technology
SCHF
USRT
-
Industrials
SCHF
USRT
-
Healthcare
SCHF
USRT
-
Basic Materials
SCHF
USRT
-
Energy
SCHF
USRT
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHF
USRT
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHF
USRT
-
Communication Services
SCHF
USRT
-
Utilities
SCHF
USRT
-
Real Estate
SCHF
USRT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHF vs. USRT — Risk / Return Rank
SCHF
USRT
SCHF vs. USRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHF | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.25 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.42 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | 7.79 | +2.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHF vs. USRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum USRT drawdown of -69.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and USRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHF | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -69.92% | +35.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -8.04% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -18.70% | +5.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -31.03% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | -44.38% | +9.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | 0.00% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -12.96% | +5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.49% | +0.50% |
Volatility
SCHF vs. USRT - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) at 4.71%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHF | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 4.71% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.42% | 9.64% | +4.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 13.57% | +3.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 18.92% | -2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 21.30% | -4.06% |
SCHF vs. USRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than USRT's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHF vs. USRT - Dividend Comparison
SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than USRT's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.96% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 2.56% | 3.07% | 2.85% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.27% | 3.12% | 3.34% | 5.66% | 3.44% | 3.98% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHF and USRT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to USRT (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs USRT's -69.92%.
On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.82% vs 6.67% for USRT. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, USRT has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 6.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for USRT.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 2.56% for USRT.
SCHF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while USRT is REIT. SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while USRT tracks FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.08% for USRT.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHF and USRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer