SCHF vs. SCHP
SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHF returned 10.24%/yr vs 2.53%/yr for SCHP. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
SCHF vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 10.24%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 15.44%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
SCHP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
SCHF vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 12.60% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.96% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHF and SCHP is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2010 | -0.01 |
The correlation between SCHF and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHF vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHF
SCHP
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
SCHF
SCHP
Technology
SCHF
SCHP
-
Industrials
SCHF
SCHP
-
Healthcare
SCHF
SCHP
-
Basic Materials
SCHF
SCHP
-
Energy
SCHF
SCHP
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHF
SCHP
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHF
SCHP
Communication Services
SCHF
SCHP
-
Utilities
SCHF
SCHP
-
Real Estate
SCHF
SCHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHF vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
SCHF
SCHP
SCHF vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHF | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.26 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 2.50 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | 7.59 | +1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHF | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 1.47 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.17 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.45 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.50 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
SCHF vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHF | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -14.26% | -20.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -1.93% | -9.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -4.48% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -14.26% | -14.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | -14.26% | -20.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.39% | -0.89% | -2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -3.93% | -3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 0.63% | +2.34% |
Volatility
SCHF vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.00%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHF | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 1.00% | +5.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.94% | 2.24% | +11.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.25% | 3.29% | +12.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 6.12% | +10.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 5.59% | +11.64% |
SCHF vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHF vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than SCHP's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.04% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 4.01% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHF and SCHP have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.24% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.24% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHF.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 3.04% for SCHF.
SCHF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.03% for SCHP.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHF and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer