SCHF vs. MCSE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and MCSE (Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. SCHF is passively managed, while MCSE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCHF returned 19.29%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for MCSE. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MCSE.

Performance

SCHF vs. MCSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 15.34% return, which is significantly higher than MCSE's 1.12% return.

SCHF

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 8.27%
• YTD: 15.34%
• 1Y: 31.49%
• 3Y*: 19.29%
• 5Y*: 9.97%
• 10Y*: 10.16%
• ALL TIME*: 7.86%

MCSE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.12%
• 1Y: 4.30%
• 3Y*: 0.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	$217.84M	$219.61M	$214.32M

SCHF vs. MCSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	15.34%	34.55%	3.28%	18.35%	9.33%
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	1.12%	7.79%	-9.46%	14.86%	10.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHF and MCSE is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2022	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHF and MCSE has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SCHF vs. MCSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHF	MCSE
Financial Services	25.6%	2.1%
Technology	16.4%	31.1%
Industrials	14.3%	18.1%
Healthcare	7.1%	20.1%
Basic Materials	6.7%	5.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	13.8%
Energy	5.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	5.0%
Utilities	3.2%	-
Communication Services	2.4%	4.7%
Real Estate	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

SCHF vs. MCSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCHF

SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 78
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 78
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 79

MCSE

MCSE Risk / Return Rank: 20
MCSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MCSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
MCSE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MCSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
MCSE Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCHF vs. MCSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHF	MCSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	0.46	+1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	0.70	+1.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.12	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	0.45	+2.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.23	1.13	+9.10

SCHF vs. MCSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHF Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the MCSE Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHF and MCSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHF vs. MCSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, which is greater than MCSE's maximum drawdown of -26.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and MCSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHF	MCSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.87%	-26.36%	-8.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.48%	-10.42%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.41%	-26.36%	+12.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.99%	-10.51%	+8.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.33%	-8.80%	+1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	4.37%	-1.28%

Volatility

SCHF vs. MCSE - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHF	MCSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.37%	0.00%	+5.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.41%	1.87%	+13.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.38%	10.29%	+7.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.70%	19.07%	-2.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.06%	19.07%	-2.01%

SCHF vs. MCSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSE's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHF vs. MCSE - Dividend Comparison

SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than MCSE's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	3.74%	3.78%	0.63%	0.57%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	3.06%	3.42%	3.26%	2.97%	2.80%	3.19%	2.08%	2.95%	3.06%	2.35%	2.58%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHF and MCSE in my portfolio?

SCHF and MCSE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHF or MCSE?

SCHF has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to MCSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs MCSE's -26.36%.

Which ETF is better, SCHF or MCSE?

On 3-year performance, SCHF leads with 19.29% vs 0.74% for MCSE. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, MCSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHF or MCSE?

Over the 3-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 19.29% return vs 0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHF or MCSE?

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCSE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHF or MCSE?

MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 3.06% for SCHF.

What is the main difference between SCHF and MCSE?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.59% for MCSE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.