SCHF vs. KEMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index while KEMX tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHF returned 9.84%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for KEMX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.

Performance

SCHF vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 42.26% return.

SCHF

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: 15.56%
• 6M: 18.62%
• 1Y: 32.67%
• 3Y*: 19.90%
• 5Y*: 9.84%
• 10Y*: 10.27%

KEMX

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 13.02%
• YTD: 42.26%
• 6M: 47.92%
• 1Y: 79.97%
• 3Y*: 29.66%
• 5Y*: 13.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHF vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	15.56%	34.55%	3.28%	18.35%	-14.80%	11.40%	9.48%	7.91%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	42.26%	38.28%	0.36%	20.57%	-19.35%	10.55%	12.84%	7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHF and KEMX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019	0.81

The correlation between SCHF and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHF vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHF	KEMX
Financial Services	20.6%	20.7%
Technology	15.7%	41.2%
Industrials	11.5%	8.6%
Basic Materials	6.5%	8.2%
Healthcare	6.5%	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	5.4%
Energy	5.0%	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	3.0%
Communication Services	2.3%	3.2%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.2%
Utilities	1.7%	2.0%

Return for Risk

SCHF vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHF

SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 59
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 61

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 91
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHF vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHF	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	3.59	-1.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	4.31	-1.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.62	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	5.24	-2.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.11	20.86	-9.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHF vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHF Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHF and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHF	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	3.59	-1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.75	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.68	-0.25

Drawdowns

SCHF vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and KEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHF	KEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.87%	-38.80%	+3.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.48%	-15.36%	+3.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.41%	-19.62%	+6.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.14%	-30.85%	+1.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-1.31%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.38%	-8.86%	+1.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	3.85%	-0.90%

Volatility

SCHF vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) is 5.66%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that SCHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHF	KEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.66%	9.86%	-4.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.34%	19.90%	-6.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.74%	22.40%	-6.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.39%	18.21%	-1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.18%	20.94%	-3.76%

SCHF vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHF vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than KEMX's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.31%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	2.96%	3.42%	3.26%	2.97%	2.80%	3.19%	2.08%	2.95%	3.06%	2.35%	2.58%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHF and KEMX in my portfolio?

SCHF and KEMX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHF or KEMX?

KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to SCHF (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

Which ETF is better, SCHF or KEMX?

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs 9.84% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHF has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHF or KEMX?

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHF or KEMX?

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for KEMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHF or KEMX?

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 2.31% for KEMX.

What is the main difference between SCHF and KEMX?

SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.25% for KEMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.