SCHF vs. IDOG
SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and IDOG (ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index while IDOG tracks the S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHF returned 10.37%/yr vs 11.04%/yr for IDOG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IDOG.
Performance
SCHF vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly higher than IDOG's 14.56% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has underperformed IDOG with an annualized return of 10.37%, while IDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.04% annualized return.
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 16.56%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 32.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
IDOG
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 34.92%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
SCHF vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 16.56% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 14.56% | 39.94% | 1.35% | 23.57% | -4.50% | 11.33% | -1.78% | 21.93% | -13.47% | 25.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHF and IDOG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2013 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SCHF and IDOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHF vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHF
IDOG
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Financial Services
SCHF
IDOG
Technology
SCHF
IDOG
Industrials
SCHF
IDOG
Basic Materials
SCHF
IDOG
Healthcare
SCHF
IDOG
Consumer Cyclical
SCHF
IDOG
Energy
SCHF
IDOG
Consumer Defensive
SCHF
IDOG
Communication Services
SCHF
IDOG
Real Estate
SCHF
IDOG
-
Utilities
SCHF
IDOG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHF vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank
SCHF
IDOG
SCHF vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHF | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 2.63 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.89 | 3.52 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.45 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 5.58 | -2.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.70 | 19.56 | -7.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHF | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.63 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.88 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.64 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.52 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
SCHF vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum IDOG drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and IDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHF | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -37.32% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -6.47% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -13.92% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -25.31% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | -37.32% | +2.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -7.93% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 1.85% | +1.10% |
Volatility
SCHF vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 4.22%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHF | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 4.22% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.32% | 10.07% | +3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.75% | 13.34% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 15.61% | +0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 17.45% | -0.26% |
SCHF vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHF vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison
SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than IDOG's 3.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.40% | 4.26% | 4.90% | 4.86% | 4.46% | 3.85% | 3.00% | 5.41% | 4.50% | 3.33% | 4.01% | 4.19% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.93% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHF and IDOG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to IDOG (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs IDOG's -37.32%.
On 10-year performance, IDOG leads with 11.04% vs 10.37% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 11.04% return vs 10.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.
IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 2.93% for SCHF.
SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.50% for IDOG.
IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHF and IDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer