PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHF vs. IDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHF vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly higher than IDOG's 14.56% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has underperformed IDOG with an annualized return of 10.37%, while IDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.04% annualized return.


SCHF

1D
0.54%
1M
5.58%
YTD
16.56%
6M
20.34%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
10.37%

IDOG

1D
0.32%
1M
2.78%
YTD
14.56%
6M
18.11%
1Y
34.92%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
11.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHF vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
16.56%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
14.56%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%21.93%-13.47%25.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHF and IDOG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2013

0.90

The correlation between SCHF and IDOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHF vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHF
IDOG

Financial Services

20.6%
11.0%

Technology

15.7%
8.5%

Industrials

11.5%
11.7%

Basic Materials

6.5%
10.0%

Healthcare

6.5%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
9.5%

Energy

5.0%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
9.4%

Communication Services

2.3%
9.9%

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Utilities

1.7%
10.0%

Financial Services

SCHF
20.6%
IDOG
11.0%

Technology

SCHF
15.7%
IDOG
8.5%

Industrials

SCHF
11.5%
IDOG
11.7%

Basic Materials

SCHF
6.5%
IDOG
10.0%

Healthcare

SCHF
6.5%
IDOG
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHF
5.7%
IDOG
9.5%

Energy

SCHF
5.0%
IDOG
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

SCHF
4.9%
IDOG
9.4%

Communication Services

SCHF
2.3%
IDOG
9.9%

Real Estate

SCHF
1.7%
IDOG

-

Utilities

SCHF
1.7%
IDOG
10.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHF vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHF vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHFIDOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

2.63

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

3.52

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.45

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

5.58

-2.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.70

19.56

-7.86

SCHF vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHF Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHF and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHFIDOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.63

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.88

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.64

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.52

-0.08

Drawdowns

SCHF vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum IDOG drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and IDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHFIDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.87%

-37.32%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-6.47%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-13.92%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

-25.31%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

-37.32%

+2.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.38%

-7.93%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

1.85%

+1.10%

Volatility

SCHF vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 4.22%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHFIDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

4.22%

+1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.32%

10.07%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

13.34%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.38%

15.61%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.19%

17.45%

-0.26%

SCHF vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHF vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than IDOG's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.40%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.93%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHF and IDOG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHF has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to IDOG (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

On 10-year performance, IDOG leads with 11.04% vs 10.37% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 11.04% return vs 10.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 2.93% for SCHF.

SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHF and IDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer