SCHF vs. IDMO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHF returned 10.24%/yr vs 12.02%/yr for IDMO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.

Performance

SCHF vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has underperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 10.24%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.02% annualized return.

SCHF

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: 12.60%
• 6M: 15.44%
• 1Y: 28.22%
• 3Y*: 18.76%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: 10.24%

IDMO

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -3.78%
• YTD: 5.33%
• 6M: 8.93%
• 1Y: 19.27%
• 3Y*: 24.47%
• 5Y*: 15.15%
• 10Y*: 12.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHF vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	12.60%	34.55%	3.28%	18.35%	-14.80%	11.40%	9.48%	22.26%	-14.29%	26.03%
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF	5.33%	42.17%	12.79%	20.16%	-12.03%	14.31%	22.01%	26.09%	-16.66%	29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHF and IDMO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012	0.65

Over the past year, SCHF and IDMO have become more correlated (0.88) than their long-term average of 0.65, meaning their price movements have been converging.

SCHF vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHF	IDMO
Financial Services	24.0%	42.4%
Technology	21.4%	5.3%
Industrials	8.9%	22.6%
Healthcare	7.3%	1.2%
Basic Materials	5.8%	10.2%
Energy	5.5%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	1.4%
Communication Services	1.8%	2.2%
Utilities	1.0%	8.4%
Real Estate	0.2%	2.0%

Return for Risk

SCHF vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHF

SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 57
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 59

IDMO

IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 36
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 35
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHF vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHF	IDMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.12	+0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	1.67	+0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.21	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	1.57	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.53	6.49	+3.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHF vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHF Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHF and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHF	IDMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75	1.12	+0.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.85	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.67	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.44	-0.02

Drawdowns

SCHF vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and IDMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHF	IDMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.87%	-39.38%	+4.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.48%	-12.31%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.41%	-12.65%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.14%	-27.07%	-2.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.87%	-31.34%	-3.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.39%	-4.49%	+1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.38%	-9.75%	+2.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	2.99%	-0.02%

Volatility

SCHF vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) have volatilities of 6.09% and 6.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHF	IDMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.09%	6.18%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.94%	15.28%	-1.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.25%	17.25%	-1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.48%	17.90%	-1.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.23%	18.14%	-0.91%

SCHF vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHF vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than IDMO's 3.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF	3.61%	3.71%	2.24%	2.89%	3.66%	1.81%	1.63%	2.78%	3.27%	3.08%	2.18%	2.52%
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	3.04%	3.42%	3.26%	2.97%	2.80%	3.19%	2.08%	2.95%	3.06%	2.35%	2.58%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHF and IDMO in my portfolio?

SCHF and IDMO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHF or IDMO?

IDMO has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to SCHF (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

Which ETF is better, SCHF or IDMO?

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.02% vs 10.24% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHF or IDMO?

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.02% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHF or IDMO?

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHF or IDMO?

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 3.04% for SCHF.

What is the main difference between SCHF and IDMO?

SCHF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.25% for IDMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.