SCHF vs. HDMV
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV).
SCHF and HDMV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. HDMV is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Aug 24, 2016.
Performance
SCHF vs. HDMV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCHF vs. HDMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 4.58% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.79% | 29.31% | 2.99% | 9.62% | -11.47% | 7.39% | -9.42% | 15.00% | -7.60% | 27.49% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCHF having a 4.58% return and HDMV slightly higher at 4.79%.
SCHF
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 31.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
HDMV
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- 20.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHF vs. HDMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than HDMV's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCHF vs. HDMV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHF
HDMV
SCHF vs. HDMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHF | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.76 | 1.55 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 2.02 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.31 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.43 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 8.61 | +1.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHF | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 1.55 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.61 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.42 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHF and HDMV is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SCHF vs. HDMV - Dividend Comparison
SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than HDMV's 4.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.27% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.68% | 5.09% | 3.24% | 3.14% | 3.53% | 3.11% | 1.45% | 3.63% | 2.88% | 3.23% | 0.18% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SCHF vs. HDMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, which is greater than HDMV's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and HDMV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHF | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -32.01% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -8.73% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -24.11% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.16% | -5.54% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.44% | -6.83% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.46% | +0.52% |
Volatility
SCHF vs. HDMV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) at 5.40%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCHF | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.94% | 5.40% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.79% | 8.26% | +3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 13.16% | +4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 11.94% | +4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 13.23% | +3.86% |