SCHF vs. FDT
SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index while FDT tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHF returned 10.10%/yr vs 10.02%/yr for FDT. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDT.
Performance
SCHF vs. FDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 14.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHF having a 10.10% annualized return and FDT not far behind at 10.02%.
SCHF
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 1Y
- 27.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 9.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
FDT
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- YTD
- 14.80%
- 1Y
- 34.70%
- 3Y*
- 23.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.02%
SCHF vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 13.29% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 14.80% | 52.21% | 6.97% | 15.03% | -19.51% | 11.43% | 4.29% | 16.82% | -19.98% | 34.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHF and FDT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SCHF and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHF vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHF
FDT
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
SCHF
FDT
Industrials
SCHF
FDT
Technology
SCHF
FDT
Basic Materials
SCHF
FDT
Consumer Cyclical
SCHF
FDT
Healthcare
SCHF
FDT
Consumer Defensive
SCHF
FDT
Energy
SCHF
FDT
Communication Services
SCHF
FDT
Utilities
SCHF
FDT
Real Estate
SCHF
FDT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHF vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank
SCHF
FDT
SCHF vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHF | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.32 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 2.60 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.97 | 8.93 | +0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHF vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and FDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHF | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -46.10% | +11.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -13.41% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -14.29% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -32.80% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | -46.10% | +11.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.73% | -9.98% | +6.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -10.73% | +3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 3.90% | -0.87% |
Volatility
SCHF vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) is 6.49%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 8.14%. This indicates that SCHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHF | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 8.14% | -1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.13% | 18.41% | -3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.16% | 20.52% | -3.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 18.61% | -1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 18.53% | -1.52% |
SCHF vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHF vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison
SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than FDT's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.91% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.11% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, SCHF and FDT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FDT has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to SCHF (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs FDT's -46.10%.
On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.10% vs 10.02% for FDT. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHF has been the lower-risk option at 6.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.10% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 2.91% for FDT.
SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.80% for FDT.
FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHF and FDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer