SCHF vs. CWI
SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and CWI (State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index while CWI tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHF returned 10.16%/yr vs 9.63%/yr for CWI. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CWI.
Performance
SCHF vs. CWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 15.34% return, which is significantly higher than CWI's 13.76% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has outperformed CWI with an annualized return of 10.16%, while CWI has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- YTD
- 15.34%
- 1Y
- 31.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.86%
CWI
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- YTD
- 13.76%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.96M | $9.98M | $9.58M | |
| $217.84M | $219.61M | $214.32M |
SCHF vs. CWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 15.34% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
CWI State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 13.76% | 32.75% | 6.27% | 15.74% | -15.39% | 8.81% | 9.83% | 21.92% | -13.83% | 26.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHF and CWI is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SCHF and CWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHF vs. CWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHF
CWI
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
SCHF
CWI
Technology
SCHF
CWI
Industrials
SCHF
CWI
Healthcare
SCHF
CWI
Basic Materials
SCHF
CWI
Consumer Cyclical
SCHF
CWI
Energy
SCHF
CWI
Consumer Defensive
SCHF
CWI
Utilities
SCHF
CWI
Communication Services
SCHF
CWI
Real Estate
SCHF
CWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHF vs. CWI — Risk / Return Rank
SCHF
CWI
SCHF vs. CWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHF | CWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.59 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.23 | 9.50 | +0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHF vs. CWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum CWI drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and CWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHF | CWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -60.77% | +25.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -11.47% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -13.85% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -28.80% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | -34.64% | -0.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | -2.27% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -12.77% | +5.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 3.12% | -0.03% |
Volatility
SCHF vs. CWI - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) have volatilities of 5.37% and 5.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHF | CWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 5.64% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.41% | 15.18% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.38% | 17.15% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 16.58% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 17.04% | +0.02% |
SCHF vs. CWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CWI's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHF vs. CWI - Dividend Comparison
SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than CWI's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWI State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 2.71% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 2.80% | 3.17% | 2.65% | 2.07% | 3.05% | 2.81% | 2.29% | 2.45% | 2.62% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.06% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SCHF and CWI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CWI has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to SCHF (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs CWI's -60.77%.
On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.16% vs 9.63% for CWI. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHF has been the lower-risk option at 5.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.16% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CWI.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 2.71% for CWI.
SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while CWI tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.30% for CWI.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHF and CWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer