SCHF vs. CGGR

Last updated Jun 10, 2026

SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and CGGR (Capital Group Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while CGGR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. SCHF is passively managed, while CGGR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCHF returned 18.76%/yr vs 23.98%/yr for CGGR. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for CGGR.

Performance

SCHF vs. CGGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than CGGR's 2.70% return.

SCHF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: 12.60%
• 6M: 15.54%
• 1Y: 28.16%
• 3Y*: 18.76%
• 5Y*: 9.26%
• 10Y*: 10.24%

CGGR

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.25%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: 17.24%
• 3Y*: 23.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHF vs. CGGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	12.60%	34.55%	3.28%	18.35%	-9.61%
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	2.70%	19.75%	32.12%	42.18%	-14.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHF and CGGR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.75

The correlation between SCHF and CGGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHF vs. CGGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHF	CGGR
Financial Services	24.0%	5.1%
Technology	21.4%	38.1%
Industrials	8.9%	7.5%
Healthcare	7.3%	9.3%
Basic Materials	5.8%	2.3%
Energy	5.5%	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	2.1%
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	13.1%
Communication Services	1.8%	16.9%
Utilities	1.0%	0.8%
Real Estate	0.2%	0.8%

Return for Risk

SCHF vs. CGGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHF

SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 57
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 59

CGGR

CGGR Risk / Return Rank: 30
CGGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
CGGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
CGGR Omega Ratio Rank: 32
CGGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
CGGR Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHF vs. CGGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHF	CGGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.03	+0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	1.46	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.19	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	1.14	+1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.48	4.19	+5.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHF vs. CGGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHF Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the CGGR Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHF and CGGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHF	CGGR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	1.03	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.79	-0.35

Drawdowns

SCHF vs. CGGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, which is greater than CGGR's maximum drawdown of -28.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and CGGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHF	CGGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.87%	-28.90%	-5.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.48%	-15.13%	+3.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.41%	-23.37%	+9.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.39%	-4.40%	+1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.37%	-7.70%	+0.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	4.13%	-1.15%

Volatility

SCHF vs. CGGR - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) have volatilities of 5.84% and 5.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHF	CGGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.84%	5.81%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.94%	13.13%	+0.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.21%	16.75%	-0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.47%	21.95%	-5.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	21.95%	-4.75%

SCHF vs. CGGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CGGR's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHF vs. CGGR - Dividend Comparison

SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than CGGR's 0.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	0.09%	0.10%	0.33%	0.40%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	3.04%	3.42%	3.26%	2.97%	2.80%	3.19%	2.08%	2.95%	3.06%	2.35%	2.58%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHF and CGGR in my portfolio?

SCHF and CGGR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHF or CGGR?

SCHF has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to CGGR (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs CGGR's -28.90%.

Which ETF is better, SCHF or CGGR?

On 3-year performance, CGGR leads with 23.98% vs 18.76% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHF or CGGR?

Over the 3-year period, CGGR has performed better with a 23.98% return vs 18.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHF or CGGR?

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGGR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHF or CGGR?

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 0.09% for CGGR.

What is the main difference between SCHF and CGGR?

SCHF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CGGR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.39% for CGGR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.