PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHE vs. RNEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHE vs. RNEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) and First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHE achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly higher than RNEM's 3.95% return.


SCHE

1D
0.87%
1M
0.50%
6M
4.90%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
7.97%
ALL TIME*
4.92%

RNEM

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.02%
6M
1.40%
YTD
3.95%
1Y
9.33%
3Y*
6.73%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$35.85K$33.48K$54.35K
$121.98M$115.93M$116.46M

SCHE vs. RNEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
10.15%26.54%10.60%8.93%-17.84%-0.65%14.49%20.31%-13.57%15.64%
RNEM
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
3.95%15.58%-1.47%23.43%-8.75%6.16%-8.16%12.76%-9.34%11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHE and RNEM is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.71

The correlation between SCHE and RNEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHE vs. RNEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHE
RNEM

Technology

33.8%
6.5%

Financial Services

21.1%
36.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
10.0%

Communication Services

7.1%
8.5%

Basic Materials

7.0%
13.8%

Industrials

6.8%
4.1%

Energy

4.2%
6.5%

Healthcare

3.4%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
5.9%

Utilities

2.8%
3.4%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.8%

Technology

SCHE
33.8%
RNEM
6.5%

Financial Services

SCHE
21.1%
RNEM
36.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHE
8.9%
RNEM
10.0%

Communication Services

SCHE
7.1%
RNEM
8.5%

Basic Materials

SCHE
7.0%
RNEM
13.8%

Industrials

SCHE
6.8%
RNEM
4.1%

Energy

SCHE
4.2%
RNEM
6.5%

Healthcare

SCHE
3.4%
RNEM
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

SCHE
3.3%
RNEM
5.9%

Utilities

SCHE
2.8%
RNEM
3.4%

Real Estate

SCHE
1.6%
RNEM
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHE vs. RNEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCHE
SCHE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SCHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

RNEM
RNEM Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RNEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNEM Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RNEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNEM Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCHE vs. RNEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) and First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHERNEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.14

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

0.87

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.43

2.31

+4.12

SCHE vs. RNEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHE Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the RNEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHE and RNEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHE vs. RNEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHE drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, smaller than the maximum RNEM drawdown of -38.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHE and RNEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHERNEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-38.38%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.29%

-10.71%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.08%

-13.09%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.38%

-21.41%

-9.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.13%

-2.33%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.51%

-9.23%

-3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

4.04%

-0.64%

Volatility

SCHE vs. RNEM - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) at 3.15%. This indicates that SCHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHERNEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

3.15%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.60%

10.89%

+4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.99%

12.51%

+5.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.87%

14.47%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.44%

17.14%

+2.30%

SCHE vs. RNEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHE has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than RNEM's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHE vs. RNEM - Dividend Comparison

SCHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than RNEM's 2.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RNEM
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
2.28%2.75%3.45%1.63%2.99%3.20%3.01%2.85%2.85%2.28%0.00%0.00%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.64%2.88%3.03%3.83%2.88%2.86%2.09%3.27%2.64%2.31%2.27%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHE and RNEM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHE has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to RNEM (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHE dropped -36.20% vs RNEM's -38.38%.

On 5-year performance, SCHE leads with 6.23% vs 5.70% for RNEM. On fees, SCHE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, RNEM has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHE has performed better with a 6.23% return vs 5.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNEM.

SCHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 2.28% for RNEM.

SCHE tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while RNEM tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SCHE and 0.75% for RNEM.

SCHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHE and RNEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer