SCHE vs. EDIV
SCHE (Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - SCHE tracks the FTSE Emerging Index while EDIV tracks the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHE returned 7.95%/yr vs 8.47%/yr for EDIV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHE charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EDIV.
Performance
SCHE vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHE achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 8.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHE has underperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 7.95%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 8.47% annualized return.
SCHE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- 6M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
EDIV
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 13.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
SCHE vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHE Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 9.54% | 26.54% | 10.60% | 8.93% | -17.84% | -0.65% | 14.49% | 20.31% | -13.57% | 32.70% |
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 8.78% | 16.45% | 12.75% | 41.91% | -15.31% | 11.21% | -9.95% | 11.80% | -6.16% | 28.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHE and EDIV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2011 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SCHE and EDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHE vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHE
EDIV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SCHE
EDIV
Financial Services
SCHE
EDIV
Consumer Cyclical
SCHE
EDIV
Basic Materials
SCHE
EDIV
Communication Services
SCHE
EDIV
Industrials
SCHE
EDIV
Energy
SCHE
EDIV
Consumer Defensive
SCHE
EDIV
Healthcare
SCHE
EDIV
Utilities
SCHE
EDIV
Real Estate
SCHE
EDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHE vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHE
EDIV
SCHE vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHE | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 1.28 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.75 | 3.74 | +3.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHE vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHE drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHE and EDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHE | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.20% | -53.36% | +17.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -10.36% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.08% | -13.84% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.40% | -28.32% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.20% | -40.76% | +4.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -1.94% | -1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.53% | -19.25% | +6.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 3.54% | -0.25% |
Volatility
SCHE vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 4.62%. This indicates that SCHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHE | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 4.62% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.24% | 11.03% | +4.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.61% | 12.79% | +4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 13.94% | +3.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 17.31% | +2.10% |
SCHE vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHE has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHE vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison
SCHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than EDIV's 4.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.17% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
SCHE Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.66% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 3.83% | 2.88% | 2.86% | 2.09% | 3.27% | 2.64% | 2.31% | 2.27% | 2.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHE and EDIV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHE has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to EDIV (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHE dropped -36.20% vs EDIV's -53.36%.
On 10-year performance, EDIV leads with 8.47% vs 7.95% for SCHE. On fees, SCHE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 8.47% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.
EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 2.66% for SCHE.
SCHE tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SCHE and 0.49% for EDIV.
SCHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHE and EDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer