SCHD vs. VB
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.91%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for VB. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.
Performance
SCHD vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 15.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed VB with an annualized return of 12.91%, while VB has yielded a comparatively lower 11.61% annualized return.
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
VB
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 28.72%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
SCHD vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.33% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and VB is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SCHD and VB shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHD vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHD
VB
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHD
VB
Healthcare
SCHD
VB
Technology
SCHD
VB
Energy
SCHD
VB
Financial Services
SCHD
VB
Industrials
SCHD
VB
Communication Services
SCHD
VB
Consumer Cyclical
SCHD
VB
Basic Materials
SCHD
VB
Utilities
SCHD
VB
Real Estate
SCHD
-
VB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
VB
SCHD vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHD | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.30 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | 3.21 | +2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 11.80 | +2.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -59.56% | +26.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -8.98% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -25.36% | +9.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -28.15% | +11.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | -42.05% | +8.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | 0.00% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -8.43% | +5.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.44% | -0.55% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 3.05%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 5.41% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.53% | 12.24% | -4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.93% | 16.68% | -5.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 20.80% | -6.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 21.44% | -4.72% |
SCHD vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHD vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than VB's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and VB have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VB has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs VB's -59.56%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.91% vs 11.61% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.18% for VB.
SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.05% for VB.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer