SCHD vs. SLVP
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.91%/yr vs 12.67%/yr for SLVP. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SLVP.
Performance
SCHD vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly higher than SLVP's -5.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHD having a 12.91% annualized return and SLVP not far behind at 12.67%.
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
SLVP
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -11.10%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 81.81%
- 3Y*
- 48.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
SCHD vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -5.37% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and SLVP is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.19 |
The correlation between SCHD and SLVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHD vs. SLVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHD
SLVP
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
SCHD
SLVP
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHD
SLVP
-
Healthcare
SCHD
SLVP
-
Energy
SCHD
SLVP
-
Financial Services
SCHD
SLVP
Industrials
SCHD
SLVP
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHD
SLVP
-
Communication Services
SCHD
SLVP
-
Basic Materials
SCHD
SLVP
Utilities
SCHD
SLVP
-
Real Estate
SCHD
-
SLVP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
SLVP
SCHD vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHD | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.26 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | 2.21 | +3.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 5.86 | +8.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -80.47% | +47.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -38.06% | +33.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -38.06% | +21.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -52.84% | +35.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | -62.03% | +28.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -31.74% | +31.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -46.78% | +43.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 14.31% | -12.42% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 3.05%, while iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a volatility of 19.61%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 19.61% | -16.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.53% | 45.17% | -37.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.93% | 54.53% | -43.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 43.15% | -28.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 42.45% | -25.73% |
SCHD vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHD vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than SLVP's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 1.88% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and SLVP have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVP has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs SLVP's -80.47%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.91% vs 12.67% for SLVP. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 12.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SLVP.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.88% for SLVP.
SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while SLVP is Silver. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.39% for SLVP.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer