SCHD vs. SGOL
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and SGOL (abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while SGOL is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.52%/yr vs 11.62%/yr for SGOL. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for SGOL.
Performance
SCHD vs. SGOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 23.36% return, which is significantly higher than SGOL's -6.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed SGOL with an annualized return of 12.52%, while SGOL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.62% annualized return.
SCHD
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- YTD
- 23.36%
- 1Y
- 26.33%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.37%
SGOL
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- -18.71%
- YTD
- -6.06%
- 1Y
- 21.20%
- 3Y*
- 27.11%
- 5Y*
- 17.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $653.58M | $651.34M | $657.10M | |
| $79.87M | $79.24M | $102.39M |
SCHD vs. SGOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 23.36% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | -6.06% | 63.99% | 26.90% | 12.99% | -0.51% | -3.94% | 25.03% | 18.21% | -1.94% | 12.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and SGOL is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.03 |
The correlation between SCHD and SGOL shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. SGOL — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
SGOL
SCHD vs. SGOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHD | SGOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.15 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.77 | 0.77 | +5.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.17 | 1.73 | +12.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. SGOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum SGOL drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and SGOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | SGOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -45.51% | +12.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -26.32% | +21.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -26.32% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -26.32% | +9.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | -26.32% | -7.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -24.94% | +24.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -18.45% | +15.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 11.64% | -9.76% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. SGOL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 3.85%, while abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | SGOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 6.07% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.91% | 23.69% | -15.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.07% | 27.79% | -16.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.37% | 18.34% | -3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 16.08% | +0.63% |
SCHD vs. SGOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SGOL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHD vs. SGOL - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, while SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.15% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and SGOL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGOL has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to SCHD (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs SGOL's -45.51%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.52% vs 11.62% for SGOL. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for SGOL.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.00% for SGOL.
SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while SGOL is Gold. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while SGOL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.17% for SGOL.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and SGOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer