PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. RYCEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than RYCEY's 6.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed RYCEY with an annualized return of 12.65%, while RYCEY has yielded a comparatively lower 7.82% annualized return.


SCHD

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.12%
YTD
18.71%
6M
19.28%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.65%

RYCEY

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
6.89%
6M
11.28%
1Y
38.97%
3Y*
110.24%
5Y*
60.04%
10Y*
7.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.71%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
6.89%123.64%88.21%253.27%-33.95%2.53%-82.05%-12.69%-7.35%40.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and RYCEY is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2014

0.39

The correlation between SCHD and RYCEY shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHDRYCEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.20

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.74

1.80

+3.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

5.11

+8.95

SCHD vs. RYCEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the RYCEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and RYCEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHDRYCEYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.04

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

1.39

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.16

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

-0.23

+1.09

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and RYCEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDRYCEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-99.07%

+65.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-21.75%

+17.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-23.37%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-62.01%

+45.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-94.64%

+61.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-78.78%

+77.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-84.19%

+80.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

7.65%

-5.77%

Volatility

SCHD vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 2.83%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a volatility of 11.26%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDRYCEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

11.26%

-8.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

32.56%

-24.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

37.74%

-26.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

43.44%

-29.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

49.35%

-32.63%

Dividends

SCHD vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than RYCEY's 0.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0.76%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.51%1.56%1.32%1.55%4.19%14.44%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.27%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHD and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYCEY has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and RYCEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer