PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 19.01% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.


SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.01%
6M
18.63%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
12.77%

QQQM

1D
-0.20%
1M
10.67%
YTD
21.39%
6M
19.75%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%10.93%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
21.39%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and QQQM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and QQQM has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SCHD vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHD
QQQM

Consumer Defensive

19.2%
7.7%

Healthcare

18.8%
4.2%

Technology

16.4%
53.8%

Energy

16.2%
0.6%

Financial Services

9.3%
0.2%

Industrials

7.5%
2.8%

Communication Services

6.3%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
12.3%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.1%

Utilities

0.0%
1.4%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

SCHD
19.2%
QQQM
7.7%

Healthcare

SCHD
18.8%
QQQM
4.2%

Technology

SCHD
16.4%
QQQM
53.8%

Energy

SCHD
16.2%
QQQM
0.6%

Financial Services

SCHD
9.3%
QQQM
0.2%

Industrials

SCHD
7.5%
QQQM
2.8%

Communication Services

SCHD
6.3%
QQQM
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHD
6.3%
QQQM
12.3%

Basic Materials

SCHD
1.2%
QQQM
1.1%

Utilities

SCHD
0.0%
QQQM
1.4%

Real Estate

SCHD

-

QQQM
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHDQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.45

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.91

3.53

+2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.53

13.52

+1.01

SCHD vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHDQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.65

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.82

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.85

+0.01

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-35.04%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-11.96%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-22.70%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-35.04%

+18.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-0.20%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-8.25%

+4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

3.11%

-1.23%

Volatility

SCHD vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 2.66%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

4.48%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

12.05%

-4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

15.91%

-4.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

22.24%

-7.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

22.12%

-5.40%

SCHD vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHD vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHD and QQQM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 8.36% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QQQM.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.15% for QQQM.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer