PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. MLPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly higher than MLPA's 14.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed MLPA with an annualized return of 12.91%, while MLPA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.37% annualized return.


SCHD

1D
0.89%
1M
3.37%
YTD
20.66%
6M
19.57%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
12.91%

MLPA

1D
-0.93%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
14.72%
6M
13.78%
1Y
13.46%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
6.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. MLPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
20.66%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
14.72%5.73%20.35%15.93%27.03%39.64%-33.97%11.91%-15.71%-8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and MLPA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2012

0.49

The correlation between SCHD and MLPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHD vs. MLPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHD
MLPA

Consumer Defensive

19.2%

-

Healthcare

18.8%

-

Technology

16.4%

-

Energy

16.2%
96.9%

Financial Services

9.3%

-

Industrials

7.5%

-

Communication Services

6.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Utilities

0.0%
3.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Consumer Defensive

SCHD
19.2%
MLPA

-

Healthcare

SCHD
18.8%
MLPA

-

Technology

SCHD
16.4%
MLPA

-

Energy

SCHD
16.2%
MLPA
96.9%

Financial Services

SCHD
9.3%
MLPA

-

Industrials

SCHD
7.5%
MLPA

-

Communication Services

SCHD
6.3%
MLPA

-

Consumer Cyclical

SCHD
6.3%
MLPA

-

Basic Materials

SCHD
1.2%
MLPA

-

Utilities

SCHD
0.0%
MLPA
3.1%

Real Estate

SCHD

-

MLPA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. MLPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPA
MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHDMLPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.19

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

1.62

+4.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.97

4.85

+9.11

SCHD vs. MLPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the MLPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and MLPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum MLPA drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and MLPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDMLPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-78.75%

+45.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-8.33%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-14.20%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-18.75%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-74.05%

+40.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-4.96%

+4.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-20.24%

+16.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.80%

-0.91%

Volatility

SCHD vs. MLPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 3.05%, while Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDMLPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

4.39%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.53%

8.56%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

11.93%

-1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

18.19%

-3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

27.45%

-10.73%

SCHD vs. MLPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPA's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHD vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than MLPA's 7.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
7.36%7.82%7.25%7.49%7.30%8.72%13.84%9.09%10.00%8.05%7.15%9.29%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.22%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHD and MLPA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPA has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs MLPA's -78.75%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.91% vs 6.37% for MLPA. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MLPA.

MLPA has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 3.22% for SCHD.

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while MLPA is MLPs. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while MLPA tracks Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.46% for MLPA.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and MLPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer