SCHD vs. MLPA
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while MLPA is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.91%/yr vs 6.37%/yr for MLPA. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for MLPA.
Performance
SCHD vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly higher than MLPA's 14.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed MLPA with an annualized return of 12.91%, while MLPA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.37% annualized return.
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
MLPA
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 6M
- 13.78%
- 1Y
- 13.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 13.94%
- 10Y*
- 6.37%
SCHD vs. MLPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 14.72% | 5.73% | 20.35% | 15.93% | 27.03% | 39.64% | -33.97% | 11.91% | -15.71% | -8.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and MLPA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2012 | 0.49 |
The correlation between SCHD and MLPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHD vs. MLPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHD
MLPA
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Energy
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHD
MLPA
-
Healthcare
SCHD
MLPA
-
Technology
SCHD
MLPA
-
Energy
SCHD
MLPA
Financial Services
SCHD
MLPA
-
Industrials
SCHD
MLPA
-
Communication Services
SCHD
MLPA
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHD
MLPA
-
Basic Materials
SCHD
MLPA
-
Utilities
SCHD
MLPA
Real Estate
SCHD
-
MLPA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. MLPA — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
MLPA
SCHD vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHD | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.19 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | 1.62 | +4.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 4.85 | +9.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum MLPA drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and MLPA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -78.75% | +45.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -8.33% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -14.20% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -18.75% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | -74.05% | +40.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -4.96% | +4.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -20.24% | +16.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.80% | -0.91% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. MLPA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 3.05%, while Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 4.39% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.53% | 8.56% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.93% | 11.93% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 18.19% | -3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 27.45% | -10.73% |
SCHD vs. MLPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPA's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHD vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than MLPA's 7.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 7.36% | 7.82% | 7.25% | 7.49% | 7.30% | 8.72% | 13.84% | 9.09% | 10.00% | 8.05% | 7.15% | 9.29% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and MLPA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPA has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs MLPA's -78.75%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.91% vs 6.37% for MLPA. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MLPA.
MLPA has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 3.22% for SCHD.
SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while MLPA is MLPs. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while MLPA tracks Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.46% for MLPA.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and MLPA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer