PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPA vs. AMLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPA vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MLPA having a 17.49% return and AMLP slightly higher at 17.77%. Over the past 10 years, MLPA has underperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 6.12%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively higher 6.74% annualized return.


MLPA

1D
1.22%
1M
0.72%
YTD
17.49%
6M
14.69%
1Y
19.63%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
6.12%

AMLP

1D
1.25%
1M
0.71%
YTD
17.77%
6M
15.18%
1Y
20.38%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
17.19%
10Y*
6.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPA vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
17.49%5.73%20.35%15.93%27.03%39.64%-33.97%11.91%-15.71%-8.31%
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
17.77%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPA and AMLP is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2012

0.94

The correlation between MLPA and AMLP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

MLPA vs. AMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MLPA
AMLP

Energy

96.9%
97.7%

Utilities

3.1%
2.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

MLPA
96.9%
AMLP
97.7%

Utilities

MLPA
3.1%
AMLP
2.3%

Basic Materials

MLPA

-

AMLP

-

Communication Services

MLPA

-

AMLP

-

Consumer Cyclical

MLPA

-

AMLP

-

Consumer Defensive

MLPA

-

AMLP

-

Financial Services

MLPA

-

AMLP

-

Healthcare

MLPA

-

AMLP

-

Industrials

MLPA

-

AMLP

-

Real Estate

MLPA

-

AMLP

-

Technology

MLPA

-

AMLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPA vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPA
MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPA vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPAAMLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

2.29

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.19

7.60

-0.41

MLPA vs. AMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the AMLP Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPA and AMLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPAAMLPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.74

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.86

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.24

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.23

-0.06

Drawdowns

MLPA vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, roughly equal to the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and AMLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPAAMLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.75%

-77.19%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.33%

-8.94%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.20%

-14.27%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.75%

-20.92%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.05%

-72.62%

-1.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-2.90%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.27%

-17.40%

-2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.69%

+0.05%

Volatility

MLPA vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) is 4.67%, while Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that MLPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPAAMLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

5.08%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

8.65%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

11.88%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

19.99%

-1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.47%

27.67%

-0.20%

MLPA vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPA has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPA vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison

MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, less than AMLP's 7.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.55%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
7.19%7.82%7.25%7.49%7.30%8.72%13.84%9.09%10.00%8.05%7.15%9.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MLPA and AMLP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AMLP has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to MLPA (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPA dropped -78.75% vs AMLP's -77.19%.

On 10-year performance, AMLP leads with 6.74% vs 6.12% for MLPA. On fees, MLPA is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, MLPA has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AMLP has performed better with a 6.74% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MLPA is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.

AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.55%, compared with 7.19% for MLPA.

MLPA tracks Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MLPA and 0.90% for AMLP.

AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPA and AMLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer