MLPA vs. AMLP
MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) and AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) are both MLPs funds - MLPA tracks the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index while AMLP tracks the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPA returned 6.12%/yr vs 6.74%/yr for AMLP. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MLPA charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AMLP.
Performance
MLPA vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MLPA having a 17.49% return and AMLP slightly higher at 17.77%. Over the past 10 years, MLPA has underperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 6.12%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively higher 6.74% annualized return.
MLPA
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 17.49%
- 6M
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 19.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.58%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
AMLP
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 17.77%
- 6M
- 15.18%
- 1Y
- 20.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.70%
- 5Y*
- 17.19%
- 10Y*
- 6.74%
MLPA vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 17.49% | 5.73% | 20.35% | 15.93% | 27.03% | 39.64% | -33.97% | 11.91% | -15.71% | -8.31% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 17.77% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPA and AMLP is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2012 | 0.94 |
The correlation between MLPA and AMLP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
MLPA vs. AMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MLPA
AMLP
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
MLPA
AMLP
Utilities
MLPA
AMLP
Basic Materials
MLPA
-
AMLP
-
Communication Services
MLPA
-
AMLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
MLPA
-
AMLP
-
Consumer Defensive
MLPA
-
AMLP
-
Financial Services
MLPA
-
AMLP
-
Healthcare
MLPA
-
AMLP
-
Industrials
MLPA
-
AMLP
-
Real Estate
MLPA
-
AMLP
-
Technology
MLPA
-
AMLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPA vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
MLPA
AMLP
MLPA vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPA | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.30 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 2.29 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.19 | 7.60 | -0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPA | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.74 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.86 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.24 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.23 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
MLPA vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, roughly equal to the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPA | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.75% | -77.19% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -8.94% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.20% | -14.27% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.75% | -20.92% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.05% | -72.62% | -1.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -2.90% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.27% | -17.40% | -2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 2.69% | +0.05% |
Volatility
MLPA vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) is 4.67%, while Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that MLPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPA | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 5.08% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.47% | 8.65% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 11.88% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 19.99% | -1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.47% | 27.67% | -0.20% |
MLPA vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPA has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPA vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, less than AMLP's 7.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.55% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 7.19% | 7.82% | 7.25% | 7.49% | 7.30% | 8.72% | 13.84% | 9.09% | 10.00% | 8.05% | 7.15% | 9.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, MLPA and AMLP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AMLP has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to MLPA (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPA dropped -78.75% vs AMLP's -77.19%.
On 10-year performance, AMLP leads with 6.74% vs 6.12% for MLPA. On fees, MLPA is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, MLPA has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, AMLP has performed better with a 6.74% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MLPA is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.
AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.55%, compared with 7.19% for MLPA.
MLPA tracks Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MLPA and 0.90% for AMLP.
AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPA and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer