MLPA vs. RDOG
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG).
MLPA and RDOG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MLPA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2012. RDOG is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index. It was launched on May 7, 2008. Both MLPA and RDOG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MLPA or RDOG.
Correlation
The correlation between MLPA and RDOG is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MLPA vs. RDOG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MLPA:
0.78
RDOG:
0.13
MLPA:
1.14
RDOG:
0.31
MLPA:
1.15
RDOG:
1.04
MLPA:
0.97
RDOG:
0.09
MLPA:
3.86
RDOG:
0.36
MLPA:
3.57%
RDOG:
6.76%
MLPA:
17.60%
RDOG:
19.57%
MLPA:
-78.74%
RDOG:
-69.88%
MLPA:
-6.43%
RDOG:
-21.05%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPA achieves a 4.38% return, which is significantly higher than RDOG's -7.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPA has outperformed RDOG with an annualized return of 2.27%, while RDOG has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.
MLPA
4.38%
-5.06%
9.93%
13.55%
25.58%
2.27%
RDOG
-7.46%
-7.11%
-12.19%
4.07%
7.29%
1.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPA vs. RDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPA has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than RDOG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MLPA vs. RDOG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MLPA
RDOG
MLPA vs. RDOG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MLPA vs. RDOG - Dividend Comparison
MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than RDOG's 6.78% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 7.19% | 7.25% | 7.49% | 7.30% | 8.72% | 13.84% | 9.09% | 10.00% | 8.05% | 7.15% | 9.29% | 5.80% |
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.78% | 6.11% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 2.98% | 5.11% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% | 2.90% |
Drawdowns
MLPA vs. RDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.74%, which is greater than RDOG's maximum drawdown of -69.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and RDOG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MLPA vs. RDOG - Volatility Comparison
Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) have volatilities of 11.18% and 10.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.