PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. IMCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly higher than IMCG's 18.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has underperformed IMCG with an annualized return of 12.91%, while IMCG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.48% annualized return.


SCHD

1D
0.89%
1M
3.37%
YTD
20.66%
6M
19.57%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
12.91%

IMCG

1D
0.83%
1M
4.95%
YTD
18.63%
6M
17.29%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
17.50%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
14.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. IMCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
20.66%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
18.63%6.55%18.14%20.73%-25.79%15.39%45.64%35.70%-3.68%25.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and IMCG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and IMCG has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SCHD vs. IMCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHD
IMCG

Consumer Defensive

19.2%
1.2%

Healthcare

18.8%
7.4%

Technology

16.4%
30.4%

Energy

16.2%
2.1%

Financial Services

9.3%
9.1%

Industrials

7.5%
26.6%

Communication Services

6.3%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
10.0%

Basic Materials

1.2%
4.5%

Utilities

0.0%
2.7%

Real Estate

-

3.4%

Consumer Defensive

SCHD
19.2%
IMCG
1.2%

Healthcare

SCHD
18.8%
IMCG
7.4%

Technology

SCHD
16.4%
IMCG
30.4%

Energy

SCHD
16.2%
IMCG
2.1%

Financial Services

SCHD
9.3%
IMCG
9.1%

Industrials

SCHD
7.5%
IMCG
26.6%

Communication Services

SCHD
6.3%
IMCG
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHD
6.3%
IMCG
10.0%

Basic Materials

SCHD
1.2%
IMCG
4.5%

Utilities

SCHD
0.0%
IMCG
2.7%

Real Estate

SCHD

-

IMCG
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. IMCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCG
IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHDIMCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.24

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

2.16

+3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.97

8.22

+5.74

SCHD vs. IMCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the IMCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and IMCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and IMCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDIMCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-58.96%

+25.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-10.17%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-21.92%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-35.08%

+18.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-35.08%

+1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-1.66%

+1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-9.21%

+5.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.66%

-0.77%

Volatility

SCHD vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 3.05%, while iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDIMCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

7.07%

-4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.53%

13.73%

-6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

16.49%

-5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

20.31%

-5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

20.58%

-3.86%

SCHD vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCHD and IMCG have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHD vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than IMCG's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.66%0.78%0.78%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.22%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHD and IMCG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMCG has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs IMCG's -58.96%.

On 10-year performance, IMCG leads with 14.48% vs 12.91% for SCHD. Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMCG has performed better with a 14.48% return vs 12.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD and IMCG have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.66% for IMCG.

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while IMCG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while IMCG tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and IMCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer