SCHD vs. EVTR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and EVTR (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while EVTR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Eaton Vance. SCHD is passively managed, while EVTR is actively managed. Over the past year, SCHD returned 26.37% vs 5.42% for EVTR. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for EVTR.

Performance

SCHD vs. EVTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than EVTR's -0.18% return.

SCHD

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 18.71%
• 6M: 19.28%
• 1Y: 26.37%
• 3Y*: 14.73%
• 5Y*: 8.49%
• 10Y*: 12.65%

EVTR

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: -0.18%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: 5.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. EVTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	18.71%	4.34%	6.23%
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	-0.18%	8.10%	4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and EVTR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024	0.20

Return for Risk

SCHD vs. EVTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 85
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 80

EVTR

EVTR Risk / Return Rank: 45
EVTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
EVTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
EVTR Omega Ratio Rank: 46
EVTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
EVTR Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. EVTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHD	EVTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	1.50	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.75	2.20	+1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.26	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.74	1.90	+3.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.06	5.94	+8.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHD vs. EVTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the EVTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and EVTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHD	EVTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	1.50	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	1.26	-0.40

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. EVTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than EVTR's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and EVTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHD	EVTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.37%	-4.08%	-29.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.61%	-2.86%	-1.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-1.90%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.32%	-0.97%	-2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	0.91%	+0.97%

Volatility

SCHD vs. EVTR - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) at 1.40%. This indicates that SCHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHD	EVTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	1.40%	+1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.60%	2.81%	+4.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.94%	3.64%	+7.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.38%	4.31%	+10.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.72%	4.31%	+12.41%

SCHD vs. EVTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than EVTR's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHD vs. EVTR - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than EVTR's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	4.70%	4.51%	4.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.27%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHD and EVTR in my portfolio?

SCHD and EVTR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHD or EVTR?

SCHD has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to EVTR (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs EVTR's -4.08%.

Which ETF is better, SCHD or EVTR?

On 1-year performance, SCHD leads with 26.37% vs 5.42% for EVTR. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, EVTR has been the lower-risk option at 1.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHD or EVTR?

Over the 1-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 26.37% return vs 5.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHD or EVTR?

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for EVTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHD or EVTR?

EVTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 3.27% for SCHD.

What is the main difference between SCHD and EVTR?

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while EVTR is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.32% for EVTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.