SCHD vs. DNN
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while DNN (Denison Mines Corp) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.91%/yr vs 18.94%/yr for DNN. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCHD vs. DNN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly higher than DNN's 15.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has underperformed DNN with an annualized return of 12.91%, while DNN has yielded a comparatively higher 18.94% annualized return.
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
DNN
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -12.32%
- YTD
- 15.04%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 85.45%
- 3Y*
- 36.24%
- 5Y*
- 16.76%
- 10Y*
- 18.94%
SCHD vs. DNN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
DNN Denison Mines Corp | 15.04% | 47.78% | 1.69% | 53.91% | -16.06% | 111.75% | 54.05% | -9.48% | -15.64% | 6.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and DNN is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and DNN has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. DNN — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
DNN
SCHD vs. DNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHD | DNN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.25 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | 2.54 | +3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 6.49 | +7.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. DNN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum DNN drawdown of -98.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and DNN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | DNN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -98.96% | +65.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -35.24% | +30.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -52.48% | +36.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -55.66% | +38.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | -75.90% | +42.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -84.13% | +84.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -85.05% | +81.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 13.74% | -11.85% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. DNN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 3.05%, while Denison Mines Corp (DNN) has a volatility of 19.82%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | DNN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 19.82% | -16.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.53% | 46.75% | -39.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.93% | 61.29% | -50.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 63.48% | -49.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 64.30% | -47.58% |
Dividends
SCHD vs. DNN - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, while DNN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNN Denison Mines Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and DNN have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DNN has higher volatility (19.82%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs DNN's -98.96%.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and DNN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer