SCHD vs. DES
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and DES (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while DES is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.49%/yr vs 8.23%/yr for DES. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DES.
Performance
SCHD vs. DES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 22.44% return, which is significantly lower than DES's 24.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed DES with an annualized return of 12.49%, while DES has yielded a comparatively lower 8.23% annualized return.
SCHD
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- YTD
- 22.44%
- 1Y
- 27.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
DES
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- 6M
- 16.48%
- YTD
- 24.63%
- 1Y
- 30.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
SCHD vs. DES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 22.44% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 24.63% | 0.25% | 9.93% | 16.50% | -10.96% | 26.51% | -4.26% | 20.26% | -12.85% | 8.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and DES is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SCHD and DES shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHD vs. DES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHD
DES
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
SCHD
DES
Consumer Defensive
SCHD
DES
Healthcare
SCHD
DES
Energy
SCHD
DES
Financial Services
SCHD
DES
Industrials
SCHD
DES
Consumer Cyclical
SCHD
DES
Communication Services
SCHD
DES
Basic Materials
SCHD
DES
Utilities
SCHD
DES
Real Estate
SCHD
-
DES
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. DES — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
DES
SCHD vs. DES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHD | DES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.34 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.92 | 4.06 | +1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.46 | 11.65 | +2.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. DES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum DES drawdown of -65.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and DES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | DES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -65.48% | +32.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -7.64% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -25.16% | +9.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -25.16% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | -45.65% | +12.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -9.63% | +6.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.66% | -0.77% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. DES - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) at 3.69%. This indicates that SCHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | DES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 3.69% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.05% | 11.05% | -3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.04% | 16.02% | -4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 19.46% | -5.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 21.91% | -5.20% |
SCHD vs. DES - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than DES's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHD vs. DES - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than DES's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.22% | 2.85% | 2.81% | 2.65% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 2.75% | 2.68% | 3.65% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 3.09% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.17% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and DES have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to DES (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs DES's -65.48%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.49% vs 8.23% for DES. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, DES has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.49% return vs 8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DES.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 2.22% for DES.
SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while DES is Small Cap Blend Equities. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while DES tracks WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR). They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.38% for DES.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and DES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer