PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 6.41% return.


SCHD

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.12%
YTD
18.71%
6M
19.28%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.65%

COWZ

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.81%
YTD
6.41%
6M
7.19%
1Y
19.32%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.71%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
6.41%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%23.41%-10.05%20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and COWZ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016

0.85

The correlation between SCHD and COWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHD vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHD
COWZ

Consumer Defensive

19.2%
10.9%

Healthcare

18.8%
21.8%

Technology

16.4%
16.0%

Energy

16.2%
16.9%

Financial Services

9.3%

-

Industrials

7.5%
8.4%

Communication Services

6.3%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
11.7%

Basic Materials

1.2%
3.7%

Utilities

0.0%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Consumer Defensive

SCHD
19.2%
COWZ
10.9%

Healthcare

SCHD
18.8%
COWZ
21.8%

Technology

SCHD
16.4%
COWZ
16.0%

Energy

SCHD
16.2%
COWZ
16.9%

Financial Services

SCHD
9.3%
COWZ

-

Industrials

SCHD
7.5%
COWZ
8.4%

Communication Services

SCHD
6.3%
COWZ
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHD
6.3%
COWZ
11.7%

Basic Materials

SCHD
1.2%
COWZ
3.7%

Utilities

SCHD
0.0%
COWZ

-

Real Estate

SCHD

-

COWZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHDCOWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.31

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.74

3.88

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

10.52

+3.54

SCHD vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHDCOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.74

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.58

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.64

+0.22

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and COWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-38.63%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-5.00%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-22.00%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-22.00%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-2.53%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-4.80%

+1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.84%

+0.04%

Volatility

SCHD vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) have volatilities of 2.83% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

2.92%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

7.21%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

11.16%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

17.64%

-3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

19.92%

-3.20%

SCHD vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHD vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than COWZ's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.94%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.27%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHD and COWZ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COWZ has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.11% vs 8.49% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.11% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.94% for COWZ.

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.49% for COWZ.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and COWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer