SCHD vs. COST
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.65%/yr vs 22.25%/yr for COST. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCHD vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 12.65%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.25% annualized return.
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 19.28%
- 1Y
- 26.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
COST
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- -3.42%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.05%
- 10Y*
- 22.25%
SCHD vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 18.71% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 13.35% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and COST is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and COST has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
COST
SCHD vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHD | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.98 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.74 | -0.22 | +5.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.06 | -0.51 | +14.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHD | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | -0.18 | +2.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.98 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 1.02 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.59 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -53.39% | +20.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -15.38% | +10.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -20.74% | +4.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -31.40% | +14.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | -31.40% | -1.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -10.93% | +9.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -13.36% | +10.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 7.15% | -5.27% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 2.83%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 7.71% | -4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.60% | 14.53% | -6.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 18.79% | -7.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 22.71% | -8.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 21.95% | -5.23% |
Dividends
SCHD vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.27% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and COST have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COST has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs COST's -53.39%.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer