PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 12.65%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.25% annualized return.


SCHD

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.12%
YTD
18.71%
6M
19.28%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.65%

COST

1D
0.30%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
13.35%
6M
10.14%
1Y
-3.42%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
22.05%
10Y*
22.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.71%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
13.35%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and COST is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and COST has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHDCOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

0.98

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.74

-0.22

+5.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

-0.51

+14.57

SCHD vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHDCOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

-0.18

+2.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.98

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

1.02

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.59

+0.27

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-53.39%

+20.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-15.38%

+10.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-20.74%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-31.40%

+14.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-31.40%

-1.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-10.93%

+9.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-13.36%

+10.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

7.15%

-5.27%

Volatility

SCHD vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 2.83%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

7.71%

-4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

14.53%

-6.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

18.79%

-7.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

22.71%

-8.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

21.95%

-5.23%

Dividends

SCHD vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.27%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHD and COST have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COST has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs COST's -53.39%.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer