PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 23.81% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 2.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 12.66%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.24% annualized return.


SCHD

1D
-1.24%
1M
5.36%
6M
15.63%
YTD
23.81%
1Y
29.05%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
12.66%
ALL TIME*
13.38%

BIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.30%
6M
1.77%
YTD
2.05%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
2.24%
ALL TIME*
1.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$784.66M$849.88M$893.68M
$774.37M$705.56M$682.78M

SCHD vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
23.81%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
2.05%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and BIL is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCHD vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHDBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-148.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

68.95

-67.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.32

347.20

-340.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.99

2,462.16

-2,446.17

SCHD vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-0.78%

-32.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-0.01%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-0.01%

-16.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-0.08%

-16.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-0.21%

-33.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

0.00%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-0.26%

-3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

0.00%

+1.83%

Volatility

SCHD vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that SCHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

0.07%

+4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

0.14%

+7.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.21%

0.20%

+11.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

0.26%

+14.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

0.26%

+16.46%

SCHD vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHD vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than BIL's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.81%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.14%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHD and BIL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.66% vs 2.24% for BIL. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.66% return vs 2.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BIL.

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 3.14% for SCHD.

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while BIL is Government Bonds. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.14% for BIL.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.09 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer