SCHC vs. AVDV
SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. SCHC is passively managed, while AVDV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHC returned 6.34%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for AVDV. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHC charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.
Performance
SCHC vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 16.64% return.
SCHC
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 12.79%
- 1Y
- 27.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
AVDV
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 6M
- 20.05%
- 1Y
- 44.34%
- 3Y*
- 28.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHC vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 10.32% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 12.02% | 10.48% | 11.51% |
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 16.64% | 49.37% | 8.67% | 16.85% | -11.47% | 15.80% | 5.01% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHC and AVDV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SCHC and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHC vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHC
AVDV
Industrials
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
SCHC
AVDV
Basic Materials
SCHC
AVDV
Financial Services
SCHC
AVDV
Consumer Cyclical
SCHC
AVDV
Technology
SCHC
AVDV
Real Estate
SCHC
AVDV
Energy
SCHC
AVDV
Healthcare
SCHC
AVDV
Consumer Defensive
SCHC
AVDV
Communication Services
SCHC
AVDV
Utilities
SCHC
AVDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHC vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHC
AVDV
SCHC vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHC | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.52 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 3.38 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.39 | 13.70 | -5.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHC | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 2.87 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.80 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.80 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
SCHC vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, roughly equal to the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and AVDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHC | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.94% | -43.01% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.48% | -13.19% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.52% | -14.17% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.48% | -28.08% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -0.83% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.05% | -6.77% | -3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 3.24% | +0.04% |
Volatility
SCHC vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) have volatilities of 4.94% and 4.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHC | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 4.79% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | 13.07% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.50% | 15.54% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 17.29% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 19.72% | -1.73% |
SCHC vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHC has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHC vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison
SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than AVDV's 2.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.73% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.32% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SCHC and AVDV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHC has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to AVDV (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs AVDV's -43.01%.
On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.84% vs 6.34% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 6.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHC is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.
SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 2.73% for AVDV.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SCHC and 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHC and AVDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer