SCHC vs. 3NIE.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L).
SCHC and 3NIE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHC is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). It was launched on Jan 14, 2010. 3NIE.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x NIO Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2021. Both SCHC and 3NIE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SCHC vs. 3NIE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCHC vs. 3NIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 4.13% | 4.87% |
3NIE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities | 5.39% | -21.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly lower than 3NIE.L's 5.39% return.
SCHC
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 7.53%
- 1Y
- 36.78%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
3NIE.L
- 1D
- 5.91%
- 1M
- 84.55%
- YTD
- 5.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHC vs. 3NIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHC has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than 3NIE.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCHC vs. 3NIE.L — Risk / Return Rank
SCHC
3NIE.L
SCHC vs. 3NIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHC | 3NIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.81 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHC | 3NIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | -0.25 | +0.64 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHC and 3NIE.L is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SCHC vs. 3NIE.L - Dividend Comparison
SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while 3NIE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.52% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
3NIE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SCHC vs. 3NIE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, smaller than the maximum 3NIE.L drawdown of -60.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and 3NIE.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHC | 3NIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.94% | -60.65% | +16.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -18.25% | +10.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.13% | -39.03% | +28.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | — | — |
Volatility
SCHC vs. 3NIE.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCHC | 3NIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.40% | 164.11% | -146.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 164.11% | -146.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 164.11% | -146.23% |