PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHB vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHB vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHB achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHB has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 14.83%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.32% annualized return.


SCHB

1D
0.35%
1M
0.46%
YTD
9.14%
6M
9.03%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
14.83%

VONG

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
4.12%
6M
3.06%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
23.77%
5Y*
14.57%
10Y*
18.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHB vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
9.14%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
4.12%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHB and VONG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.93

The correlation between SCHB and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHB vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHB
VONG

Technology

34.4%
51.4%

Financial Services

12.2%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
13.2%

Communication Services

10.1%
13.2%

Industrials

9.4%
5.7%

Healthcare

8.9%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
2.7%

Energy

3.7%
0.4%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.4%

Utilities

2.3%
0.3%

Basic Materials

2.0%
0.3%

Technology

SCHB
34.4%
VONG
51.4%

Financial Services

SCHB
12.2%
VONG
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHB
10.1%
VONG
13.2%

Communication Services

SCHB
10.1%
VONG
13.2%

Industrials

SCHB
9.4%
VONG
5.7%

Healthcare

SCHB
8.9%
VONG
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

SCHB
4.6%
VONG
2.7%

Energy

SCHB
3.7%
VONG
0.4%

Real Estate

SCHB
2.4%
VONG
0.4%

Utilities

SCHB
2.3%
VONG
0.3%

Basic Materials

SCHB
2.0%
VONG
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHB vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHB vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHBVONGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

1.31

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.80

4.39

+8.41

SCHB vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHB Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHB and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHBVONGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.36

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.69

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.88

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.89

-0.06

Drawdowns

SCHB vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHB drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHB and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHBVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.27%

-32.72%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-16.23%

+7.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-23.27%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

-32.72%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

-32.72%

-2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-4.47%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-4.88%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

4.85%

-2.90%

Volatility

SCHB vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) is 3.93%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that SCHB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHBVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

4.78%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.57%

12.08%

-2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.41%

15.71%

-3.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

21.38%

-4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

20.90%

-2.56%

SCHB vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHB vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than VONG's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.04%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.44%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SCHB and VONG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VONG has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to SCHB (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHB dropped -35.27% vs VONG's -32.72%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.32% vs 14.83% for SCHB. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.32% return vs 14.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.

SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.44% for VONG.

SCHB is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHB and 0.06% for VONG.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHB and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer