SCHB vs. QUS
SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) and QUS (State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - SCHB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHB returned 14.82%/yr vs 13.70%/yr for QUS. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SCHB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
SCHB vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHB achieves a 13.99% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 11.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHB has outperformed QUS with an annualized return of 14.82%, while QUS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.70% annualized return.
SCHB
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 13.09%
- YTD
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 24.10%
- 3Y*
- 21.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- 14.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.37%
QUS
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- 6M
- 9.40%
- YTD
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- 20.72%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.07M | $4.72M | $3.42M | |
| $214.57M | $200.25M | $257.32M |
SCHB vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 13.99% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 20.76% | 30.79% | -5.43% | 21.20% |
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 11.79% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 12.40% | 32.45% | -3.66% | 21.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHB and QUS is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SCHB and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHB vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHB
QUS
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHB
QUS
Financial Services
SCHB
QUS
Industrials
SCHB
QUS
Healthcare
SCHB
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
SCHB
QUS
Communication Services
SCHB
QUS
Consumer Defensive
SCHB
QUS
Energy
SCHB
QUS
Real Estate
SCHB
QUS
Utilities
SCHB
QUS
Basic Materials
SCHB
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHB vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
SCHB
QUS
SCHB vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHB | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.41 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 3.04 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.64 | 13.56 | -1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHB vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHB drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, roughly equal to the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHB and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHB | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.27% | -33.78% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -6.85% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.34% | -13.94% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -22.30% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.27% | -33.78% | -1.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | 0.00% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -3.66% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 1.53% | +0.55% |
Volatility
SCHB vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 2.76%. This indicates that SCHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHB | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 2.76% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 7.06% | +3.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.11% | 9.21% | +3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 14.33% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 16.40% | +1.93% |
SCHB vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHB vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than QUS's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.25% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHB and QUS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHB has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to QUS (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHB dropped -35.27% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 14.82% vs 13.70% for QUS. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 14.82% return vs 13.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUS.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 1.01% for SCHB.
SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHB and 0.15% for QUS.
QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHB and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer