PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHB vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHB vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHB achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 13.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHB having a 14.69% annualized return and FNDX not far behind at 14.02%.


SCHB

1D
-2.70%
1M
0.39%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.28%
1Y
25.82%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
14.69%

FNDX

1D
-1.66%
1M
1.12%
YTD
13.43%
6M
13.56%
1Y
31.89%
3Y*
20.40%
5Y*
12.60%
10Y*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHB vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
8.76%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
13.43%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%28.65%-7.30%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHB and FNDX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013

0.92

The correlation between SCHB and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHB vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHB
FNDX

Technology

34.4%
19.1%

Financial Services

12.2%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.2%

Communication Services

10.1%
10.1%

Industrials

9.4%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.9%
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
7.4%

Energy

3.7%
10.3%

Real Estate

2.4%
1.8%

Utilities

2.3%
3.2%

Basic Materials

2.0%
3.7%

Technology

SCHB
34.4%
FNDX
19.1%

Financial Services

SCHB
12.2%
FNDX
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHB
10.1%
FNDX
9.2%

Communication Services

SCHB
10.1%
FNDX
10.1%

Industrials

SCHB
9.4%
FNDX
9.3%

Healthcare

SCHB
8.9%
FNDX
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

SCHB
4.6%
FNDX
7.4%

Energy

SCHB
3.7%
FNDX
10.3%

Real Estate

SCHB
2.4%
FNDX
1.8%

Utilities

SCHB
2.3%
FNDX
3.2%

Basic Materials

SCHB
2.0%
FNDX
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHB vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHB vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHBFNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.57

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

5.28

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

20.64

-7.34

SCHB vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHB Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHB and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHBFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

3.09

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.83

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.80

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.79

+0.03

Drawdowns

SCHB vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHB drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHB and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHBFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.27%

-37.72%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-6.06%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-16.30%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

-19.06%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

-37.72%

+2.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-1.66%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-3.55%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.55%

+0.40%

Volatility

SCHB vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.76%. This indicates that SCHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHBFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

2.76%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.56%

7.47%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

10.36%

+2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

15.19%

+2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

17.50%

+0.83%

SCHB vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHB vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than FNDX's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.46%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.04%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHB and FNDX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHB has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to FNDX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHB dropped -35.27% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 14.69% vs 14.02% for FNDX. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 14.69% return vs 14.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.04% for SCHB.

SCHB is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHB and 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHB and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer