SCHA vs. XLK
SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHA returned 11.39%/yr vs 25.11%/yr for XLK. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHA charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
SCHA vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 21.09% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 27.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHA has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 11.39%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.11% annualized return.
SCHA
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 21.09%
- 6M
- 16.82%
- 1Y
- 39.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
XLK
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 27.41%
- 6M
- 24.16%
- 1Y
- 53.33%
- 3Y*
- 30.17%
- 5Y*
- 21.81%
- 10Y*
- 25.11%
SCHA vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 21.09% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 27.41% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHA and XLK is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.72 |
The correlation between SCHA and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHA vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHA
XLK
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
SCHA
XLK
Industrials
SCHA
XLK
Financial Services
SCHA
XLK
-
Healthcare
SCHA
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHA
XLK
-
Real Estate
SCHA
XLK
-
Energy
SCHA
XLK
Basic Materials
SCHA
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHA
XLK
-
Utilities
SCHA
XLK
-
Communication Services
SCHA
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHA vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
SCHA
XLK
SCHA vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHA | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.39 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 3.37 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.27 | 10.91 | +4.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHA vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHA | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -82.05% | +39.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -15.92% | +6.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.29% | -25.66% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -33.56% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.41% | -33.56% | -8.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.57% | +7.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -34.93% | +27.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 4.90% | -2.31% |
Volatility
SCHA vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) is 6.55%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.87%. This indicates that SCHA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHA | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.55% | 10.87% | -4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 18.91% | -5.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 22.54% | -3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 25.19% | -3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 24.64% | -1.89% |
SCHA vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHA vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than XLK's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.42% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHA and XLK have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to SCHA (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.11% vs 11.39% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHA has been the lower-risk option at 6.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.11% return vs 11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLK.
SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.42% for XLK.
SCHA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHA and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer