SCHA vs. FYX
SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) and FYX (First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - SCHA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index while FYX tracks the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHA returned 11.72%/yr vs 13.06%/yr for FYX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCHA charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for FYX.
Performance
SCHA vs. FYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCHA having a 22.53% return and FYX slightly higher at 22.94%. Over the past 10 years, SCHA has underperformed FYX with an annualized return of 11.72%, while FYX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.06% annualized return.
SCHA
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 22.53%
- 6M
- 20.00%
- 1Y
- 41.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.85%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 11.72%
FYX
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 22.94%
- 6M
- 20.86%
- 1Y
- 47.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
SCHA vs. FYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 22.53% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 22.94% | 12.68% | 12.22% | 18.30% | -18.41% | 27.43% | 19.48% | 21.32% | -10.64% | 14.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHA and FYX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SCHA and FYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHA vs. FYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHA
FYX
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
SCHA
FYX
Financial Services
SCHA
FYX
Industrials
SCHA
FYX
Healthcare
SCHA
FYX
Consumer Cyclical
SCHA
FYX
Real Estate
SCHA
FYX
Energy
SCHA
FYX
Basic Materials
SCHA
FYX
Consumer Defensive
SCHA
FYX
Communication Services
SCHA
FYX
Utilities
SCHA
FYX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHA vs. FYX — Risk / Return Rank
SCHA
FYX
SCHA vs. FYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHA | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.43 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.42 | 6.27 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.18 | 20.40 | -4.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHA vs. FYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, smaller than the maximum FYX drawdown of -61.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and FYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHA | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -61.80% | +19.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -7.56% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.29% | -27.91% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -27.91% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.41% | -48.82% | +6.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -0.12% | -1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -10.86% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.32% | +0.27% |
Volatility
SCHA vs. FYX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) at 4.89%. This indicates that SCHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHA | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 4.89% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | 12.29% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.77% | 18.42% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.05% | 21.96% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 24.20% | -1.45% |
SCHA vs. FYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FYX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHA vs. FYX - Dividend Comparison
SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than FYX's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.67% | 0.64% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.65% | 1.12% | 1.08% | 0.60% | 0.94% | 0.88% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SCHA and FYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHA has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to FYX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs FYX's -61.80%.
On 10-year performance, FYX leads with 13.06% vs 11.72% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FYX has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FYX has performed better with a 13.06% return vs 11.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.
SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.67% for FYX.
SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.63% for FYX.
FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHA and FYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer