SCHA vs. FSMD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) and FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - SCHA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index while FSMD tracks the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHA returned 7.13%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for FSMD. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCHA charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FSMD.

Performance

SCHA vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than FSMD's 14.85% return.

SCHA

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 19.79%
• 6M: 19.32%
• 1Y: 40.27%
• 3Y*: 18.92%
• 5Y*: 7.13%
• 10Y*: 11.13%

FSMD

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 3.46%
• YTD: 14.85%
• 6M: 14.81%
• 1Y: 25.71%
• 3Y*: 17.63%
• 5Y*: 9.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHA vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF	19.79%	11.60%	11.16%	18.46%	-19.81%	16.45%	19.34%	7.61%
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF	14.85%	8.70%	15.18%	17.37%	-11.15%	26.40%	8.94%	8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHA and FSMD is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019	0.96

The correlation between SCHA and FSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHA vs. FSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHA	FSMD
Technology	23.3%	18.2%
Financial Services	15.7%	15.4%
Industrials	15.4%	20.7%
Healthcare	13.5%	11.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	11.1%
Real Estate	6.0%	6.2%
Energy	5.5%	4.6%
Basic Materials	4.2%	3.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	3.3%
Communication Services	2.4%	2.8%
Utilities	2.3%	2.2%

Return for Risk

SCHA vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHA

SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 71
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

FSMD

FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 53
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHA vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHA	FSMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	1.69	+0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	2.47	+0.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.30	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.26	3.06	+1.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.66	11.03	+4.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHA vs. FSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHA Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the FSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHA and FSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHA	FSMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25	1.69	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.53	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.55	+0.02

Drawdowns

SCHA vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, roughly equal to the maximum FSMD drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and FSMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHA	FSMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.41%	-40.67%	-1.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.50%	-8.44%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.29%	-22.16%	-5.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.79%	-22.16%	-8.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-0.08%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.58%	-6.00%	-1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	2.34%	+0.24%

Volatility

SCHA vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) at 4.45%. This indicates that SCHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHA	FSMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	4.45%	+0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.83%	11.37%	+1.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.01%	15.26%	+2.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.93%	18.48%	+3.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.71%	21.42%	+1.29%

SCHA vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FSMD's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHA vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison

SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than FSMD's 1.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF	1.21%	1.33%	1.29%	1.37%	1.54%	1.18%	1.32%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF	1.00%	1.26%	1.51%	1.42%	1.37%	1.19%	1.05%	1.39%	1.58%	1.24%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHA and FSMD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SCHA and FSMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCHA or FSMD?

SCHA has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to FSMD (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs FSMD's -40.67%.

Which ETF is better, SCHA or FSMD?

On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 9.66% vs 7.13% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FSMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHA or FSMD?

Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 9.66% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHA or FSMD?

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FSMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHA or FSMD?

FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 1.00% for SCHA.

What is the main difference between SCHA and FSMD?

SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index, while FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.29% for FSMD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.