SCGVX vs. CSUAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCGVX (Sands Capital Global Growth Fund) and CSUAX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SCGVX returned 10.92%/yr vs 7.38%/yr for CSUAX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCGVX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for CSUAX.

Performance

SCGVX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sands Capital Global Growth Fund (SCGVX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCGVX achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 9.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SCGVX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 10.92%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.38% annualized return.

SCGVX

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: 2.58%
• 6M: 2.63%
• 1Y: 3.81%
• 3Y*: 12.94%
• 5Y*: 1.01%
• 10Y*: 10.92%

CSUAX

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: 9.47%
• 6M: 8.83%
• 1Y: 16.20%
• 3Y*: 11.76%
• 5Y*: 6.74%
• 10Y*: 7.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCGVX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCGVX Sands Capital Global Growth Fund	2.58%	10.68%	15.64%	31.49%	-43.49%	9.56%	49.33%	29.89%	-2.97%	38.38%
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	9.47%	14.30%	8.30%	2.09%	-5.20%	16.24%	-1.65%	24.26%	-5.83%	17.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SCGVX and CSUAX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011	0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between SCGVX and CSUAX has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SCGVX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCGVX

SCGVX Risk / Return Rank: 4
SCGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
SCGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
SCGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
SCGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
SCGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

CSUAX

CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 40
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCGVX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sands Capital Global Growth Fund (SCGVX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCGVX	CSUAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	1.70	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	2.47	-2.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.30	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	2.75	-2.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.56	9.19	-8.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCGVX vs. CSUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCGVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the CSUAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCGVX and CSUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCGVX	CSUAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23	1.70	-1.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.52	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.50	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.55	-0.09

Drawdowns

SCGVX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCGVX drawdown since its inception was -53.96%, roughly equal to the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCGVX and CSUAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCGVX	CSUAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.96%	-52.20%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.39%	-5.99%	-15.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.07%	-14.95%	-8.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.96%	-20.45%	-33.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.96%	-35.05%	-18.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.36%	-3.39%	-9.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.09%	-8.44%	-3.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.17%	1.79%	+5.38%

Volatility

SCGVX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison

Sands Capital Global Growth Fund (SCGVX) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.14%. This indicates that SCGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCGVX	CSUAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.34%	3.14%	+2.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.37%	7.82%	+6.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.86%	9.68%	+8.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.57%	12.99%	+12.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.97%	14.92%	+8.05%

SCGVX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCGVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCGVX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison

SCGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.40%, more than CSUAX's 7.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	7.39%	8.09%	2.23%	2.17%	3.55%	2.95%	1.30%	1.52%	2.08%	5.00%	2.04%	6.20%
SCGVX Sands Capital Global Growth Fund	45.40%	46.57%	9.14%	0.00%	0.00%	13.05%	3.34%	5.97%	9.05%	0.23%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCGVX and CSUAX in my portfolio?

SCGVX and CSUAX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCGVX or CSUAX?

SCGVX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to CSUAX (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCGVX dropped -53.96% vs CSUAX's -52.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.