SCDV vs. QQQS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCDV (Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF) and QQQS (Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SCDV is actively managed, while QQQS is passively managed. Over the past year, SCDV returned 14.53% vs 79.99% for QQQS. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCDV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQQS.

Performance

SCDV vs. QQQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCDV achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than QQQS's 27.27% return.

SCDV

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 10.50%
• 6M: 10.22%
• 1Y: 14.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQS

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: 27.27%
• 6M: 27.40%
• 1Y: 79.99%
• 3Y*: 15.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCDV vs. QQQS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SCDV Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF	10.50%	3.09%	-6.38%
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF	27.27%	23.03%	-3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SCDV and QQQS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024	0.70

The correlation between SCDV and QQQS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCDV vs. QQQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCDV

SCDV Risk / Return Rank: 27
SCDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
SCDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
SCDV Omega Ratio Rank: 26
SCDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
SCDV Martin Ratio Rank: 28

QQQS

QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 85
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCDV vs. QQQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCDV	QQQS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	3.00	-2.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	3.78	-2.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.44	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	5.90	-4.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.92	19.70	-15.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCDV vs. QQQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the QQQS Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCDV and QQQS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCDV	QQQS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	3.00	-2.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.63	-0.39

Drawdowns

SCDV vs. QQQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCDV drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, smaller than the maximum QQQS drawdown of -38.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDV and QQQS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCDV	QQQS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.84%	-38.06%	+15.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.38%	-13.63%	+2.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.88%	-2.55%	-1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.55%	-13.26%	+7.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	4.07%	-0.36%

Volatility

SCDV vs. QQQS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) is 5.16%, while Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that SCDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCDV	QQQS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.16%	7.39%	-2.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.71%	18.49%	-6.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.59%	26.90%	-11.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.19%	28.34%	-9.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.19%	28.34%	-9.15%

SCDV vs. QQQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCDV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQS's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCDV vs. QQQS - Dividend Comparison

SCDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than QQQS's 2.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF	2.73%	3.48%	0.80%	0.68%	0.04%
SCDV Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF	0.52%	0.61%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCDV and QQQS in my portfolio?

SCDV and QQQS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCDV or QQQS?

QQQS has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to SCDV (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDV dropped -22.84% vs QQQS's -38.06%.

Which ETF is better, SCDV or QQQS?

On 1-year performance, QQQS leads with 79.99% vs 14.53% for SCDV. On fees, QQQS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SCDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCDV or QQQS?

Over the 1-year period, QQQS has performed better with a 79.99% return vs 14.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCDV or QQQS?

QQQS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SCDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCDV or QQQS?

QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 0.52% for SCDV.

What is the main difference between SCDV and QQQS?

They also come from different issuers: Bahl & Gaynor and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SCDV and 0.20% for QQQS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.