SCDS vs. ALIL
SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) and ALIL (Argent Focused Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SCDS returned 46.17% vs 13.96% for ALIL. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCDS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for ALIL.
Performance
SCDS vs. ALIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCDS achieves a 23.60% return, which is significantly higher than ALIL's 8.05% return.
SCDS
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 23.60%
- 6M
- 24.35%
- 1Y
- 46.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALIL
- 1D
- 2.18%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 8.05%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 13.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCDS vs. ALIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 23.60% | 27.36% |
ALIL Argent Focused Small Cap ETF | 8.05% | 6.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCDS and ALIL is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2025 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SCDS and ALIL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCDS vs. ALIL — Risk / Return Rank
SCDS
ALIL
SCDS vs. ALIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCDS | ALIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.55 | 0.76 | +1.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.55 | 1.24 | +2.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.14 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | 1.05 | +4.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.30 | 3.07 | +15.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCDS | ALIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 0.76 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 0.71 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
SCDS vs. ALIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCDS drawdown since its inception was -26.71%, which is greater than ALIL's maximum drawdown of -12.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDS and ALIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCDS | ALIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.71% | -12.60% | -14.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -12.60% | +3.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.29% | -3.19% | -2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 4.32% | -1.78% |
Volatility
SCDS vs. ALIL - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) have volatilities of 5.53% and 5.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCDS | ALIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 5.69% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 13.53% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.18% | 18.51% | -0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 18.95% | +2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 18.95% | +2.27% |
SCDS vs. ALIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCDS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ALIL's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCDS vs. ALIL - Dividend Comparison
SCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than ALIL's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ALIL Argent Focused Small Cap ETF | 0.43% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 0.91% | 1.15% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SCDS and ALIL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ALIL has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to SCDS (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDS dropped -26.71% vs ALIL's -12.60%.
On 1-year performance, SCDS leads with 46.17% vs 13.96% for ALIL. On fees, SCDS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SCDS has been the lower-risk option at 5.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCDS has performed better with a 46.17% return vs 13.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCDS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for ALIL.
SCDS has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.43% for ALIL.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Argent. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCDS and 0.74% for ALIL.
SCDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCDS and ALIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer