PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCDL vs. WTIU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SCDL vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SCDL vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SCDL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN
24.46%2.05%14.99%-2.99%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
141.86%-17.13%-29.63%-28.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCDL achieves a 24.46% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 141.86% return.


SCDL

1D
0.85%
1M
-5.08%
YTD
24.46%
6M
26.60%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*

WTIU

1D
-5.22%
1M
43.87%
YTD
141.86%
6M
115.33%
1Y
68.67%
3Y*
6.81%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SCDL vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCDL and WTIU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

SCDL vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCDL
SCDL Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SCDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCDL Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SCDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCDL Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCDL vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCDLWTIUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

0.85

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.09

1.47

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.21

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

1.42

-0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.80

2.65

+0.15

SCDL vs. WTIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCDL Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the WTIU Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCDL and WTIU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCDLWTIUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

0.85

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.00

+0.47

Correlation

The correlation between SCDL and WTIU is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SCDL vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SCDL nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SCDL vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCDL drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDL and WTIU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SCDLWTIUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.87%

-75.73%

+40.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.74%

-53.11%

+27.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.81%

-14.27%

+8.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.26%

-39.51%

+27.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.61%

28.50%

-19.89%

Volatility

SCDL vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) is 4.69%, while MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that SCDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SCDLWTIUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

17.75%

-13.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.48%

44.75%

-29.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.67%

80.86%

-48.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.06%

69.25%

-40.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.12%

69.25%

-40.13%