SCDL vs. CEFD
SCDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN) and CEFD (ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - SCDL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (200%), while CEFD is a fund fund tracking the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index (150%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCDL returned 9.40%/yr vs 3.13%/yr for CEFD. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SCDL vs. CEFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCDL achieves a 37.06% return, which is significantly higher than CEFD's 6.26% return.
SCDL
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 37.06%
- 6M
- 35.80%
- 1Y
- 50.97%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- —
CEFD
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- 1Y
- 18.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- —
SCDL vs. CEFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 37.06% | 2.05% | 14.99% | 0.18% | -13.06% | 52.47% |
CEFD ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN | 6.26% | 14.15% | 20.06% | 8.36% | -28.93% | 18.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCDL and CEFD is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2021 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCDL and CEFD has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCDL vs. CEFD — Risk / Return Rank
SCDL
CEFD
SCDL vs. CEFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCDL | CEFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.29 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.03 | 1.47 | +3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.65 | 6.84 | +5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCDL | CEFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 1.43 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.18 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.52 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
SCDL vs. CEFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCDL drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum CEFD drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDL and CEFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCDL | CEFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -36.95% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -12.51% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.79% | -21.76% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.87% | -36.95% | +2.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.79% | -1.14% | -1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.96% | -11.72% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 2.68% | +1.36% |
Volatility
SCDL vs. CEFD - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD) at 4.05%. This indicates that SCDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCDL | CEFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 4.05% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.82% | 11.27% | +3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.66% | 12.86% | +8.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.02% | 17.93% | +11.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.89% | 17.31% | +11.58% |
SCDL vs. CEFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCDL and CEFD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SCDL vs. CEFD - Dividend Comparison
SCDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFD ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN | 14.58% | 14.88% | 13.90% | 14.76% | 16.56% | 10.31% | 5.37% |
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCDL and CEFD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCDL has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to CEFD (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDL dropped -34.87% vs CEFD's -36.95%.
On 5-year performance, SCDL leads with 9.40% vs 3.13% for CEFD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, CEFD has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCDL has performed better with a 9.40% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCDL and CEFD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
CEFD has the higher dividend yield at 14.58%, compared with 0.00% for SCDL.
SCDL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (200%), while CEFD tracks S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index (150%).
SCDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCDL and CEFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer