SCDL vs. AMND
SCDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN) and AMND (ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050) are both exchange-traded funds - SCDL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (200%), while AMND is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCDL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMND.
Performance
SCDL vs. AMND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCDL
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 37.06%
- 6M
- 35.80%
- 1Y
- 50.97%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- —
AMND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCDL vs. AMND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 37.06% | 2.05% | 14.99% | 0.18% | -13.06% | 52.47% |
AMND ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 40.42% | 13.60% | 21.27% | 23.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCDL and AMND is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2021 | 0.53 |
The correlation between SCDL and AMND shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCDL vs. AMND — Risk / Return Rank
SCDL
AMND
SCDL vs. AMND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCDL | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.03 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCDL | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SCDL vs. AMND - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCDL | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.79% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.96% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | — | — |
Volatility
SCDL vs. AMND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCDL | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.66% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.02% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.89% | — | — |
SCDL vs. AMND - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCDL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMND's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCDL vs. AMND - Dividend Comparison
Neither SCDL nor AMND has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMND ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.14% | 6.56% | 6.37% | 7.10% | 2.49% |
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCDL and AMND have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCDL.
SCDL and AMND have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SCDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AMND is Energy Equities. SCDL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (200%), while AMND tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SCDL and 0.75% for AMND.
Find the right allocation for SCDL and AMND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer