AMND vs. LBAY
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY).
AMND and LBAY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMND is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2020. LBAY is an actively managed fund by Toroso Investments. It was launched on Nov 16, 2020.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMND or LBAY.
Key characteristics
| AMND | LBAY | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.31% | 3.49% |
| 1Y Return | 21.95% | -0.91% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 17.79% | 7.54% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.76 | -0.12 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.67% | 9.57% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.21% | -15.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.12% | -7.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMND and LBAY is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AMND vs. LBAY - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AMND achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly higher than LBAY's 3.49% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMND vs. LBAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMND has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LBAY's 1.09% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMND vs. LBAY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMND vs. LBAY - Dividend Comparison
AMND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than LBAY's 3.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMND ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 | 6.27% | 6.56% | 6.37% | 7.10% | 2.49% |
LBAY Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF | 3.40% | 3.47% | 2.74% | 2.96% | 0.29% |
Drawdowns
AMND vs. LBAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMND drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, which is greater than LBAY's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMND and LBAY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMND vs. LBAY - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) at 2.79%. This indicates that AMND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.