PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCDGX vs. SGSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCDGX vs. SGSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Core Equity Fund (SCDGX) and DWS Global Small Cap Fund (SGSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCDGX achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than SGSCX's 19.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SCDGX has outperformed SGSCX with an annualized return of 15.03%, while SGSCX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.13% annualized return.


SCDGX

1D
-1.53%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
7.56%
6M
6.35%
1Y
22.02%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
15.03%

SGSCX

1D
-1.65%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
19.48%
6M
17.73%
1Y
37.27%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
9.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCDGX vs. SGSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCDGX
DWS Core Equity Fund
7.56%16.32%20.01%25.55%-15.61%25.54%16.14%35.68%-6.06%21.52%
SGSCX
DWS Global Small Cap Fund
19.48%20.22%5.35%24.62%-24.63%15.10%16.98%22.29%-21.96%19.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SCDGX and SGSCX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1992

0.77

The correlation between SCDGX and SGSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCDGX vs. SGSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCDGX
SCDGX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SCDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SCDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SGSCX
SGSCX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SGSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SGSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCDGX vs. SGSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Core Equity Fund (SCDGX) and DWS Global Small Cap Fund (SGSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCDGXSGSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

4.12

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.41

15.38

-4.97

SCDGX vs. SGSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCDGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the SGSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCDGX and SGSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCDGX vs. SGSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCDGX drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, smaller than the maximum SGSCX drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDGX and SGSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCDGXSGSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.85%

-62.26%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-9.54%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.72%

-22.37%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.77%

-33.72%

+10.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

-45.98%

+10.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.07%

-1.92%

-2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-14.10%

+5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

2.55%

-0.29%

Volatility

SCDGX vs. SGSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Core Equity Fund (SCDGX) is 5.21%, while DWS Global Small Cap Fund (SGSCX) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that SCDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCDGXSGSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

5.96%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

12.45%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.84%

16.04%

-3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

18.98%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

19.45%

-1.04%

SCDGX vs. SGSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCDGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SGSCX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCDGX vs. SGSCX - Dividend Comparison

SCDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.70%, more than SGSCX's 8.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCDGX
DWS Core Equity Fund
9.70%10.50%9.11%5.12%9.28%14.09%6.70%8.88%14.12%6.15%6.92%8.72%
SGSCX
DWS Global Small Cap Fund
8.68%10.37%6.35%5.12%5.42%16.72%0.36%0.29%18.31%11.13%7.52%6.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCDGX and SGSCX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGSCX has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to SCDGX (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDGX dropped -55.85% vs SGSCX's -62.26%.

SGSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCDGX and SGSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer