SCDGX vs. SWPPX
SCDGX (DWS Core Equity Fund) and SWPPX (Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SCDGX returned 14.97%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SWPPX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCDGX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SWPPX.
Performance
SCDGX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCDGX having a 9.70% return and SWPPX slightly higher at 10.15%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCDGX having a 14.97% annualized return and SWPPX not far ahead at 15.55%.
SCDGX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 9.40%
- 1Y
- 26.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.97%
SWPPX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 27.14%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.08%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
SCDGX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCDGX DWS Core Equity Fund | 9.70% | 16.32% | 20.01% | 25.55% | -15.61% | 25.54% | 16.14% | 35.68% | -6.06% | 21.52% |
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund | 10.15% | 17.87% | 24.96% | 26.26% | -18.14% | 28.67% | 18.38% | 31.46% | -4.47% | 21.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCDGX and SWPPX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 1997 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SCDGX and SWPPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCDGX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank
SCDGX
SWPPX
SCDGX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Core Equity Fund (SCDGX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCDGX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 3.04 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | 13.71 | -1.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCDGX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCDGX drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, roughly equal to the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDGX and SWPPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCDGX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.85% | -55.06% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -8.89% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.72% | -18.74% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.77% | -24.51% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -33.80% | -1.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.16% | -1.38% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -9.93% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.97% | +0.27% |
Volatility
SCDGX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison
DWS Core Equity Fund (SCDGX) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) at 4.83%. This indicates that SCDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCDGX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 4.83% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.16% | 9.94% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 12.50% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.18% | 17.03% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 18.27% | +0.17% |
SCDGX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCDGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCDGX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison
SCDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.70%, more than SWPPX's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCDGX DWS Core Equity Fund | 9.70% | 10.50% | 9.11% | 5.12% | 9.28% | 14.09% | 6.70% | 8.88% | 14.12% | 6.15% | 6.92% | 8.72% |
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund | 1.01% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.43% | 1.67% | 1.27% | 1.81% | 1.95% | 2.67% | 1.79% | 2.55% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SCDGX and SWPPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCDGX has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to SWPPX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDGX dropped -55.85% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.
SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCDGX and SWPPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer